even that wont save it
1 Like
it gets 6 “possibly” good missiles
1 Like
Since when did you speak french
crazy to think we went from the 1990s 120a to the early 2000s 120c with only downgrades
The 120C-5 is a sidegrade, not a downgrade
1 Like
now the 2010s 120d which is probably gonna be even worse based on the pattern
Lol, lmao
its a downgrade i fear, most people dont bvr
120C is supposed to have dual plane maneuvering while AFAIK 120B doesn’t IRL.
If both do, then 120C performs worse regardless, but if both do then both are wrong.
I do hope Gaijin is working on and is close to implementing dual plane maneuvering, cause we have over half a dozen missiles that use it IRL.
i do, and i always take c5s at the start of the match, but after that theyre useless
I mean irl the 120a and 120b have different lofting algorithms but in game they’re the same. snail just be how it do.
Are you gonna deny the fact that the 120C-5 is better suited for BVR?
I mean this community leaks highly classified military documents, of course you can expect overstudied trailers etc.
It doesnt matter, its nowhere near how it acts in real life in any situation
yea i saw their differences are just programming or something like that, didnt hear about lofting til now though
since all my life …
@Smin1080p_WT Are you able to comment if the new f-16 is an F-16 PoBIT? Based on the skin and model shown in the trailer it seems to be an F-16CM Block 52 RMP based on research I’ve done. But I know in past instances the model and more specifically skin did not matter so I’m just curious.
Honestly im not sure. I know that irl it stops wobbling as it burns off its fuel greatly increasing range due to lack of drag but i have no idea if thats modeled either.
How is it wrong though?
More details will follow in the coming days. Stay tuned tomorrow.
2 Likes