Alvis always plays the same argument every time: On every other nation than the US, he’d take a fanmade document as evidence enough.
On the US, however, it needs to have a whole wikipedia article or a explicit document from the DoW to be valid.
this is like me saying “well the f15ex can use the mrml, why cant the f15a?”
Well no shii, I’m just giving you the level of realness of these pylons, I’m not saying they’re perfectly real
They exist, just on a different aircraft
I hate these forum debates, we’re driving in circles
this is so many people not just him im afraid, like theyre paid by russia to hate on ANYTHING us mains want
“on a different aircraft” thats the key point dude
Oh lord
I know dang shii
“well dude, the su35 can take dual racks, why cant the mig 29a?”
Oh yeah I’m still going to try and play it becuase I like causing suffering onto mys…I mean I like a challenge.
However if Gaijin seriously considers putting this F-16 at 14.7 I’ll still be vocal about finding that a stupid idea.
I do appreciate that you’d think I’d take a fanmade F-15 document to prove MRMLs on F-15EX, but I assure you I wouldn’t.
I have the same standards as anyone else.
I do like that you think I love American jets that much though. I love my F-15s, just not so much to believe fanmade stuff about them.
@Jailynn_ひ
If Russia paid me to shill for American vehicles as much as I do, that’d be funny.
I’m not claiming it’s ok for gods sake
I can confirm this.
The SU-30s also ruin all of 12.3s’ existence as well.
3 Likes
theyre literally real racks used on real planes, why arent you up in arms about the other 3 jets i mentioned, theyre just as real as the amber racks for the most part
At least 60% of what you see at top tier is a very educated guesstimation, 1:1 representations to meet your expectations are basically impossible to achieve without actively gimping the US air tech tree.
well why not complain to get the extra missiles removed from the other jets
yea im ngl alvis every time i see you on here its just ranting and being negative
the first thing you said when you came into this thread is “the f15ex would never get 16 missiles, its limited to 12 boeing told me so”
I’m not complaining about MRML. However I’d be complaining about AMBERs unless we get proof of them being used to fire AMRAAMs on an airframe or another
they need to fly first…
who they didnt
if we dont get amber im okay with that, ive said that im fine with 16 missiles minimum, since we’re already got mrml on the ge, theres no reason to not add them to the ex
16 maximum.