I’m not claiming it’s ok for gods sake
I can confirm this.
The SU-30s also ruin all of 12.3s’ existence as well.
4 Likes
theyre literally real racks used on real planes, why arent you up in arms about the other 3 jets i mentioned, theyre just as real as the amber racks for the most part
At least 60% of what you see at top tier is a very educated guesstimation, 1:1 representations to meet your expectations are basically impossible to achieve without actively gimping the US air tech tree.
well why not complain to get the extra missiles removed from the other jets
yea im ngl alvis every time i see you on here its just ranting and being negative
the first thing you said when you came into this thread is “the f15ex would never get 16 missiles, its limited to 12 boeing told me so”
I’m not complaining about MRML. However I’d be complaining about AMBERs unless we get proof of them being used to fire AMRAAMs on an airframe or another
they need to fly first…
who they didnt
if we dont get amber im okay with that, ive said that im fine with 16 missiles minimum, since we’re already got mrml on the ge, theres no reason to not add them to the ex
16 maximum.
minimum
I think its less whether that amber racks could or couldnt fire missiles and more that they were proven to not be functional?
you cant get more than 16…
Well I’m fine with 16 missiles too, I’ve been saying this from the start. They’re most likely real, and at least as real as the current GE loadout so it would be 100% ok for the game
i could go into a whole rant about why the amber racks are more realistic than other racks theyve added in game, but idc enough to, 16 is fine to me but even more would be cool
Yes, they are real racks, as I’ve stated many times myself.
Also, why would I get up in arms about any mentioned jets?
I don’t have classified documents, and even if I did I wouldn’t be able to share them.
Cause the only thing that’s going to disprove J-10C for example, is a manual that includes loadout restrictions made recently, which isn’t going to be accessible to us, let alone the fact I don’t speak Mandarin.
@PyroAddict
You used the wrong word.
The correct word to use in the sentence is “buffing”.
It should read as “Your high expectations of American jets are basically impossible to achieve without actively buffing the US air tech tree.”
i agree w you there
What do you mean by not functional
@AydanL44_Hunter bro ce gars est un ragebait de malade, un coté il te dit ouia 16 c’est ok, l’autre non 16 c’est minimum et peut avoit plus