Whot
hope its not that late lmao
I have work starting 2200 gmt ;-;
you open the doors more
1 Like
Lower it thru the roof 4head ))
Full honesty, take what I said with a massive grain of salt . I was just giving a generalised look at in war thunder I simply based what i said on info I have heard, or have present.
If you have documents or such saying otherwise then your probably right but the graphic you posted one doesn’t apply to the f15E’s in game as we got a variant that has the 229’s, it also comes from a magazine and not a primary source like the straight up developers, Boeing. all though from what I’ve heard that news outlets is pretty fair so possibly just an old article.
Now in all honesty I had to make the assumption due to larger payload capacity stated on the official f15ex site as I assumed for it to reach the same 81000 pound take off limit with an extra 6500 payload that they would have to be lighter despite apparently receiving the reinforcement during development to carry the larger payload.
And to be fair I also was under the assumption they were using the same engines as the f15E in game uses and they do the 229 because of complaints, (despite the fact it should not have them unless it was an AESA variant.)
So same engines probably lighter when not fully payload loaded makes me assume by the basic rules of t-w it would probs be faster although if anyone has any detailed sources stating otherwise please give me I love this aircraft and want to read more.
also regarding the composite I will be the first to say I’m actually not 100%, on it as they could have lost weight from removing or upgrading older systems it just makes the most sense logically after some one pointed it out of the f15ex machinery of war topic or at least I think that one if you look though my activity you might find it.
also i really miss the officallf15e site cause i really want to double check since the official f15ex site says this but I don’t 100% know if they count the f15E despite designation as a fighter when they say this.
does anyone have the way back machine link for the boeing F15E site possibly?
sorry meant to make it a reply @Macron-Spokesman
you cook to good of food for the morning that seems like so much effort
1 Like
I just started again wih stock aesa typhoon.
And stock planes suck either way
And standard typhoon werent specialy known for a great radar performance either
It’s normal for Thai food, try some!
We roughly know the thrust increase from the PW-229 to the GE-129 through the F-16s.
The F-16C Block 50 has the GE-129, the F-16I Block 52+ has the PW-229.
A similar change will happen when going from the E to the EX
1 Like
cant allergic to like 90% of what goes in thai dishes i miss being able to have thai food.
yeah but e ingame has the 229 anyways
Remember it’s holy basil not thai basil it’s very different
Yes, and the EX has the GE-129. The GE-129 will have slightly better thrust at most speeds
im gonna watch this video and see what ratio of ingredients allergic to and not lol.
1 Like
neither are available to me so it doesn’t matter
9X was requested since the r73 was added realistically, so you could actually argue it’s been requested since at least the dev introduction of the MiG 29 (although it was then delayed)
1 Like
Sad
yes but at that time it was understandable that 9X and other western TVC Missiles wouldn’t come to the game because they’re a lot better than the R-73
the problem tho is that a 9M doesn’t even remotely fill a similar capability role as the R-73 does because it’s not as mobile
1 Like
adjustment to the probability of jh7a/prototype’s up tier rate, although this plane has a good IR missile(pl5e2), but if it up tiers to 13.0 or 13.3, with all the AIM7M/P, pl12, r77, this plane becomes very hard to play. I would say, still the jh7a behaves well in 12.7, and OK in 13.0. But definitely bad in 13.3