not even silly at all
Its just balancing
My concern is whether the UK really needs it when EF brings the C-5 into extreme efficiency and makes good use of it.
Does the UK even need a better version of the missile itself?
They plan to add the 120D at first to balance the US air coz US jets are not doing as well as the others do, but that’s not the problem of UK, EF brings good stats for UK air, so the UK doesn’t really need the 120D.
I know you are not gonna take my opinion seriously, just think of my crying, whatever it means
Everything has been decided
Not discussed
Sigh
Well, the Eurofighter doesn’t get AIM-120D by the looks of it. But if you say the Super Hornet is too good with AIM-120D for the game, then maybe the US also shouldn’t get it.
Yes and in War thunder terms that is just a main fighter the EF has nothing to do with naval warfare which the Australian Hornets will fill that hole between the SA harrier and the F-35, just because he already have the EF doesn’t mean that’s the only thing we are likely to get.
But it is funny to see people just rehashing the “Tornado argument” with the Typhoon one lol
Gameplay reasons as it wasn’t fair for the US to solely have the new 120D’s
Lmao, US doing badly in ARB lmao get a grip but then again you should be happy with the F-15C GE since we should be happy with our EF’s lol
There are no earlier EFTs to add. The ones we have in game with the M-Scan are (for air combat) already as early as it gets. The only difference T1 EFTs would have is the lack of A2G armament
The British Hornet also does not have a good flight model. Just because the British Hornet is getting aim-120d doesn’t automatically mean that UK Eurofighter is getting aim-120d too