At least there will be some IFVs, so there will be vehicles that take at least some skill to play (I hope).
Depends on the IFV imo
A lot of autocannon IFVs don’t require much skill to play either
1 Like
Bmpt and turm
Neither of those are IFVs
Would love to see one of the ZBL08 chassis’ atgm carriers or anti air options at some point in terms of light vehicles.
1 Like
Bmpt is ? Its literally made based on bmp2 performance against city infantry.
The BMPT cannot carry troops
That’s the key feature of an IFV
That a apc not ifv
APCs are unarmed (or lightly armed) vehicles that are only meant to carry troops
IFVs are tanks and armoured cars with both a proper armament and a troop transport compartment
Yes as heavy armored bmpt
May not able to carry troops but is 100% capable being ifv
No, the BMPT is not an IFV.
It literally doesn’t have the capacity to carry troops. If it cannot carry troops, it’s not an IFV.
It’s an AFV (Armoured Fighting Vehicle).
There are many high capability ammunition and spare parts production facilities, count the ecrn and scafse among them
Its was about air forces and big billions project budget like the tejas
1 Like
idk about that
2 Likes
Yeah but ifv is armored, not same level but can be a AFV
Again, if it cannot carry troops, it’s not an IFV
Its in the name, bmpt is both a ifv and afv.
Can act as a infantry fighting as well as a armored fighting to defend squadron.
2 in 1
Nope, it’s at 14.3
Ok bro
Whatever you say
The Russians don’t call it an IFV (they call it a tank support vehicle), the definition of an IFV is a properly armed troop transport vehicle and the BMPT lacks that functionality, but fine, you keep on calling it an IFV
a 2 in 1 does both things worse than the equivalent vehicle