ofc not lol
@Smin1080p_WT Ajax should be moved to after the warriors, or the warrior and desert warrior should be moved into the right line, it makes zero sense why the light tanks are split like that.
2 Likes
Yea it looks fire, insane thrust and 8 missiles. Will be fun as hell, Gonna grind it fasho. Tho unsure whether to get that or gripen e first
1 Like
Compatibility has to be shown. As I answered you.
its their way of monetizing.
Buy expensive undertiered vehicle → move up br → now useless
Bro,why don’t give US NEW M1 with APS
Idk man, I feel like most play the game to play vehicles themselves… not for flags that do nothing in the gameplay aspect of things
Okay so it is not feasibility and BM #1 got his words mixed up
That is all i wanted to know
he isnt a dev he doesnt decide that
Ajax is a replacement for CVR(T), britains light tanks.
while itself is much closer to the design of modern IFVs its by doctrine a light tank, at the weight of a medium.
Basically its a cruiser tank
The British Phantoms had their own developments. Again it can be considered if you can show compatability, this has always been the case.
Hey, atleast we got the lws and 30 smokes
copium su-30mki with kh38 in future
1 Like
yea. for skyflash.
the F4J however was a hand me down from the US so doesnt really have this issue, also has the same engines as the yankee ones
what about gripen not getting any good cas while being able to yeet all sorts of stuff (SPICE and BRIMSTOME)
1 Like
Would it be a possibility for me to bug report R-Darter/Derby for Swedish Gripens on the compatability grounds then?
So are we FINALLY FINALLY FINALLY get APHE M61 and M86 for British tanks??
2 Likes
If it can be proven to be compatable.
Again guys, literally nothing has changed today that was not already the case yesterday.
Again, they didn’t say why its there. You cant just refer to a non-answer as an answer. You got feedback, plenty of it. That it was hypocritical after the VT4 issue, and shouldn’t be added. Why is it there after all that?
1 Like