The British Phantoms had their own developments. Again it can be considered if you can show compatability, this has always been the case.
Hey, atleast we got the lws and 30 smokes
copium su-30mki with kh38 in future
yea. for skyflash.
the F4J however was a hand me down from the US so doesnt really have this issue, also has the same engines as the yankee ones
what about gripen not getting any good cas while being able to yeet all sorts of stuff (SPICE and BRIMSTOME)
Would it be a possibility for me to bug report R-Darter/Derby for Swedish Gripens on the compatability grounds then?
So are we FINALLY FINALLY FINALLY get APHE M61 and M86 for British tanks??
If it can be proven to be compatable.
Again guys, literally nothing has changed today that was not already the case yesterday.
Again, they didn’t say why its there. You cant just refer to a non-answer as an answer. You got feedback, plenty of it. That it was hypocritical after the VT4 issue, and shouldn’t be added. Why is it there after all that?
Yes so add the flag is not problem.
giving fake missles to a different nation is still a bit weird though
Im confused.
How do you prove 2 identical aircraft are identical?
What are the requirements for ‘proven’, the MKM has never been tested with, considered or proposed to receive the KH38 series, so how would someone go about proving compatability for it??
They look the same, therefore it is by gaijin
like how you cant prove the KH38MT to exist or be fake when theres zero information about it, because its fake
Well smin’s right, the standard hasn’t changed, but it’s application has, and it’s all really confusing xD
Watch them add the MKI and say “it doesn’t have Kh-38 compatability”
the kh38 family are used, everything is the same as the other kh38, only seeker is different
what you should ask is the proof of non existing ir kh38 seeker
Oh but Gaijin said they have sufficient evidence. Wont give it to us but just know they have it.
Simple, its the aircraft of Theseus. Its obvious that two gripen Cs are not identical. /s