Historical figures, at least. Soyuz’s can’t possibly be historical because those guns were never mounted on those turrets, which were never constructed. So the reload is 100% arbitrary for “balance” and not based in historical facts, like the Japanese reloads are.
Still 1.4 seconds faster than Iowa for… no particular reason.
Agreed. Should be 30 and 35, respectively.
one must forget their meds for a few days to believe gaijin is interested in balancing this game
I want some spicy british prototypes man
I think Gnes and Sevestapol have to be seriously discussed as well in relation to a potential HMS Nelson premium.
They both should have a 70 second reload if they are being historically accurate.
@Smin1080p_WT Will the F16A MLU be repaired more thoroughly? Gaijin gave it FOX 3s which is very good but it lacks a lot of air-to-air weapons
AIM 120 C
AIM 9M/P4
but especially air-to-ground weapons
AGM-84L
AGM 65 G
AGM 65 D
Paveway II GBU serie
LANTRIN POD
Now that the MLU is in 13.3 why is it not similar in CAS to the Belgian F16 AM
We know which BAE Prototype Smin really wants.
But im still just really wanting a proper Mosquito
this would push it into a br where you dont want it. simple as that
how about the canberra that tested an afterburner
That would be fun. Though AF spawn at 8.7 doesnt sound fun
it is in 13.3 with FOX 2 without IRCCM, At this level I prefer to have it in 13.7 like the F16C but with AIM 9M and AIM 120C + GBU
Likely due to the fact that the UK getting a Hornet was a request long before they came to the game.
And it was said by BVVD that they’d look at the possibility of the UK getting a hornet at a later date(they said the same thing about Germany)
Tho we don’t know if it will truly be two Horents. (or any at all, after all, leak lists are never guaranteed)
Albeit I’m one of the ones who want a Hornet. The CF-188 joining the UK tree would do a number of things for me.
then what would be the point of the 16C
and on top of that it’s lighter than the F16C and performs better in dogfights so 13.7 doesn’t bother me
Does have some awesome skins. So Im guessing it will come with none
As I said, Gaijin does math on Soyuz(which is not a clever move), and follow manual on Iowa(which includes barrel elevation time). That’s why.
Not actually, unfinished ships reload were usually based on its design, since when RN Comandante Margottini was first added.
Actually, current Soyuz is case what you’ve said, as it does not get 2.5 rpm, which is best figure on her design.
Jesus. I supposse we are almost blessed, then, lmao
May I ask- what differences are there between Nelson and Rodney? Any improvements, considering a late war fit?
@SPANISH_AVENGER Besides, experience on using both Iowa and Soyuz for this update makes my thought confident, that Soyuz’s protection is what makes her shine.
And while there are no clear clue and way to nerf Soyuz’s protection, there are very one way to buff Iowa’s surviability to Soyuz’s level. Removing the barbette fire.
Barbette fire critically reduce firepower of Iowa as exploding its shell room, and even more critical, threatening it’s life on Bismarck and Roma because fire spreads to magazine.
If this mechanism is not removed, nothing will change of fighting against Soyuz, as she could have chance of explode enemy ship in the long range, where her flat trajectory shines, whatever Soyuz’s reload become.
