A LOT more AA and there were some armour upgrades I think, but im not the best to ask for that
1 Like
Apparently several FB Mk VI had a search radar added in Norwegian service, at least F-AG (pictured) and KK-E.
Looks like it have lost its machine guns, but retain the ability to carry rockets. And possibly other secondary armaments.
1 Like
well as much to give the real armament of the F16 MLU whether it is 13.3 or 13.7 like the F16C or the F16 AM, the MLU will always have its flare problem so as much to find alternatives to make it just more competitive FOX 2 IRCCM = AIM 9M like the F16 C and AM at the same Br 13.7 and for the disadvantage of flare they can give it the AIM 120 C + GBU to make it more versatile since it is in a Br where all the planes are very versatile
finally I make a whole explanation but just F16A MLU = AM I prefer to have it in 13.7 with fox 2 IRCCM than in 13.3 without IRCCM without GBU without AGM 65 IR etc
100% agreed. Soyuz sometimes feels straight up imprevious to damage.
And, as you said, Iowa’s biggest weakness is barbette fires blowing up the ammo before you can even shut them down.
In general, I would just be happy if Soyuz’s armor was made more grounded- giving it Rolled instead of Cemented values would be enough.
As of now, I just don’t see the point of playing any other ship that isn’t Soyuz, being Iowa the only and closest true counterpart. Bismarck? Yamato? Vanguard ROMA? All of those are just Soyuz fodder.
Nelson removes catapult in 1940s, and after 1940s Nelson went to refit much more time than Rodney. Because she usually got hit by mine or something and went to repair, and then Rodney was put in the field in exchange of her.
For 1945 HMS Nelson, she is one of best AA armed British battleship along with 4 quadruple bofors.
1 Like
Real question is how will they implement it, they could go the Swiss route and just make it a clone of the other 14.0 hornets so that it has effective CAS, but given its thr only other nation to use BOL in service with their legacy models it makes me wonder if they’ll make it worthless for CAS because of BOL as thats the trade off for BOL.
but the Finnish C ones all have BOL too?
Shouldnt be 14.0. We do not need a 14.0 F-18 at all. If they add it there, it will be a waste of space alongside the Typhoon and Gripen C
The only place that they should add a F-18 to the British TT, if they realistically should at all, is 12.3/12.7.
2 Likes
a 12.3 one would be nice
Smin on the bridge!
These are two seperate features. The new nuclear carriers also require new bomb models and skins.
4 Likes
If that were the case then the F18C with no BOL, a worse RWR and no HMS wouldn’t be 14.0
I still argue the Tornado F3 holds it own. Especially if ever finished. I know i’ve destroyed enough F-18s in the F3 at least. But we do lack something more dogfight orientated
but they both do get BOL
I checked
Also when saying only other nation. Both the Australians and Finnish are the only nations i know irl they use BOL in service with their legacy hornets.
The US has once again received some mid-ranking freaks. While everyone else is given high-ranking IFVs and MBTs.
Thank you! I supposse the armor is the same, then?
Please post your image of a F-18C with BOL cause i think you’re misunderstanding me.
Im referring to the Finnish one called the F-18C which lacks BOL.
Hopefully next objective is buffing helicopters, right now all of them are useless unless you have LDIRCM (Z10ME/MI28NM)
1 Like