Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Yes, the Bradley is just the tusk package, or the same era as the sep. The lav 25 is already in game the turret is on the desert warrior and the hull is just the lav. Both are good additions.

@Smin1080p_WT may I ask why the Drone scouts were allready pushed to live, while the “new” nuke Carrier come with the Major update?

2 Likes

Yeah… “reloads as a balance factor” truly are a wonderful thing.

You see, it is VITAL for balance that Soyuz has the fastest reload among all 406mm guns. 28 seconds, faster than Iowa, while having twice the explosive power with the same penetration on a significantly armored ship.

Likewise, it is vital for balance that Roma has a 45 second aced reload. Etc.

2 Likes

Of course, the soviets were known for their naval supremecy, they single handedly won the naval conflicts in the atlantic and pacific whilst Britain and the US just plodded around in their dingys

3 Likes

fine believe that gaijin will make the grind easier by adding a bunch of top tier jets to the same tt.

And this is why I don’t like naval (or the FV4005), it’s frankly boring waiting for a reload long enough for me to read a page or two in whatever book I’m reading at the time

Just to play something like Atlanta, Doesnt have a reload

how about subs? would you like subs?

is playing a sub that’s sneaking onto a Big boy and eventually getting him more fun than waiting 45s to reload?

imo yes

1 Like

damn. still no mig 25 or 31 on that list.

Is it a possibility the Mosquito FB mk VI (ASH) is a premium, and the only difference from the ordinary FB mk VI is the addition of depth charges?

Have anyone heard of a FB mk VI variant that could fit the description of ASH?

yes, it has a radar

iirc that was posted here earlier

never gonna be

So you purposely except Mutsu and Amagi as they are 410 mm while having 24 seconds?
Also, Soyuz’s reload is not exact 28 seconds, but 28.6 seconds. And is not to make superiority but Gaijin’s simple, but ridiculous math of adding 2.5 and 1.7 then divide by 2 (2.5 is at loading angle, 1.7 is at maximum elevation on turret design).
For explosive filler, as owner of two ships, actual damage output is same as although Soyuz has more filler, Iowa has heavier shell. Shell damage in naval doesn’t only concluded by filler.

For Roma and Rodney, yes I want to have buff. But my point is, Gaijin does not purpoesly buff Soyuz. They just don’t know what they are doing.

so why is britain getting what looks to be 2 copy paste hornets… instead of idk… a unique British cold war jet…

Seems likely.

does anyone roughly now the minimum range for the buk m3

I thought FBs had AI radars, while the ASH radars were used on the TFs.

Was it posted in this thread or on this forum in general?

3km ish I think I read somewhere

Im just hoping we can finally get Brimstones

in that case i will cope and hope that gaijin will allow you to mix the composition of your deployed vehicles for these sams