I’m really grateful for the work Gszabi does for the community but yeah it really does show that critical thinking is at an all time low when people read the past times and assume it’s a guarantee that new updates/teasers/devblogs must arrive at the same times otherwise they are “late” or “delayed.”
4 Likes
Ok not update but teaser
i would personally love to see an update based around quality of life.
2 Likes
ive seen 2 polls suggesting this, one that was mine and i think deathmisser made the other one much earlier, and last time i checked it had 87% approval lmao
youre definitely not the only one i think
2 Likes
Ah yes, the mythical Quality of Life update that will fix all of the games’ problems, why won’t Gaijin just do this?
lol
1 Like
More QOL updates are nice.
I enjoyed the 5+ QOL updates in the last 2 years and am supportive of more.
because there is no money to be made in a perfect free to play game
Hey. To answer the first part, its a primary source. So only one is needed. To answer the second, its a suggestion not a bug. Reload rates can be reported as suggestions. It doesn’t mean they will be implemented, as reloads are a soft balance tool.
2 Likes
It’s a complicated and nuanced subject. That nuance gets completely ignored by the people who say “We should have an update that doesn’t add any content and just fixes problems,” and it’s absolutely exhausting to hear and to see how widely such an idea is supported.
Fixing problems in the game is a good thing. Gaijin does that with every major update and adds content that allows them to make money and keep the game going. Yes, that model means there are always going to be new problems to fix. But any game that is as large as War Thunder in scope will have such issues. The truth is that bug fixes, error reports, et cetera can’t be acted upon without a large staff of developers and contractors working on the game, and those people can’t be employed without a steady stream of new content getting people to invest in the game.
Since the day 1 of the game I would wager actually lol.
thing is. theyre adding more problems than they can fix. theres vehicles and mechanics that have been broken for literal years, with basically everyone knowing about it. and theyre still here
Than you never played games from EA 😂
the problem with ea begins with… ea.
ea is the problem.
bf6 slapped though
Hello, Smin.
I have a question, for operator nation bug reports, are they considered suggestions? And that’s why they take a long time to fix?
War thunder still has so more potential.
like just adding more game modes would bring in more players like, 1v1 2v2 etc.
can gaijin give the F-16I python 4 but atleast nerf its irccm for balance??
2 Likes
No need to nerf it, they can just copypaste the broken IRIS-T or 9X irccm. Well yeah theoretically and actually thats a nerf now that i realize it… you get what i mean (excuse my dumb tired self)
If the IRCCM isn’t fully known, they’ve been known to implement missiles such as AAM-3 and Stinger.
However, if the IRCCM is fully known and is superior to what they want in-game currently, then they won’t implement the missile period.
AAM-3 for example likely won’t get its IRCCM fixed until gen 5 aircraft are added because it’s a step above what we have currently.
Clearly it means my Beloved FV101 scorpion!
2 Likes
Do you mean that in general or for air-to-air missiles only? Because at least the IRIS-T variants are wrongly implemented, but still in the game.
For example, blinding laser of the level we have in-game should not work on them but they do.
1 Like