Its probably ready by now so they can make a set time
I don’t think there ever was an update that actually was ready for release
Putting out a release date for the teaser or posting it too early just makes people more impatient and upset when the update comes out later than expected
2 Likes
personally, with some very specific exceptions, the vehicles dont even matter to me anymore. its just a matter of how theyll implement them that has me excited. because yeah getting a new vehicle is cool and all but why play it if they cant be bothered to do it right, resulting in the thing being cheeks.
im excited for the dev server. saves me just a little disappointment
I’m really grateful for the work Gszabi does for the community but yeah it really does show that critical thinking is at an all time low when people read the past times and assume it’s a guarantee that new updates/teasers/devblogs must arrive at the same times otherwise they are “late” or “delayed.”
4 Likes
Ok not update but teaser
i would personally love to see an update based around quality of life.
2 Likes
ive seen 2 polls suggesting this, one that was mine and i think deathmisser made the other one much earlier, and last time i checked it had 87% approval lmao
youre definitely not the only one i think
2 Likes
Ah yes, the mythical Quality of Life update that will fix all of the games’ problems, why won’t Gaijin just do this?
lol
1 Like
More QOL updates are nice.
I enjoyed the 5+ QOL updates in the last 2 years and am supportive of more.
because there is no money to be made in a perfect free to play game
Hey. To answer the first part, its a primary source. So only one is needed. To answer the second, its a suggestion not a bug. Reload rates can be reported as suggestions. It doesn’t mean they will be implemented, as reloads are a soft balance tool.
2 Likes
It’s a complicated and nuanced subject. That nuance gets completely ignored by the people who say “We should have an update that doesn’t add any content and just fixes problems,” and it’s absolutely exhausting to hear and to see how widely such an idea is supported.
Fixing problems in the game is a good thing. Gaijin does that with every major update and adds content that allows them to make money and keep the game going. Yes, that model means there are always going to be new problems to fix. But any game that is as large as War Thunder in scope will have such issues. The truth is that bug fixes, error reports, et cetera can’t be acted upon without a large staff of developers and contractors working on the game, and those people can’t be employed without a steady stream of new content getting people to invest in the game.
Since the day 1 of the game I would wager actually lol.
thing is. theyre adding more problems than they can fix. theres vehicles and mechanics that have been broken for literal years, with basically everyone knowing about it. and theyre still here
Than you never played games from EA 😂
the problem with ea begins with… ea.
ea is the problem.
bf6 slapped though
Hello, Smin.
I have a question, for operator nation bug reports, are they considered suggestions? And that’s why they take a long time to fix?
War thunder still has so more potential.
like just adding more game modes would bring in more players like, 1v1 2v2 etc.
can gaijin give the F-16I python 4 but atleast nerf its irccm for balance??
2 Likes
No need to nerf it, they can just copypaste the broken IRIS-T or 9X irccm. Well yeah theoretically and actually thats a nerf now that i realize it… you get what i mean (excuse my dumb tired self)