it is a straight-up worse us because they don’t add original vehicles.
what was the reason rank 1-3 wasn’t added, even tho it 100% could be added?
why keep adding magachs and copy pasted stuff, and not original vehicles?
like there isnt 50+ options to add
2 Likes
The whole business model is turning frustration and dissatisfaction into dollar bills tho
Just like Coastal and Bluewater.
End it at 7.0-7.3 for WWII and continuing the other one at 7.3-7.7.
My personal belief is that paper vehicles are a no-go. Atleast only TRUE Paper vehicles are a no-go. If there was atleast some attempt to build it, and it has the parts, then why not? But I guess those come under very early partially built prototypes. I think it comes down to it opening a can of worms.
Meh, I think its much better to just go off capability. I’m not fine with pushing the Concept 3 to 7.7 because its newer.
Separating eras doesn’t facilitate adding new vehicles to the game, and separation of eras can create balancing issues, for example you’d have an IS-3 (introduced in 1944) fighting late World War Two units as example when in today War Thunder it mostly faces post-war designs (e.g. M48) and early Cold War (e.g. Leopard) units.
2 Likes
Still waiting for this beauty (Nakajima G10N1). Some parts were build but never ensembled as a whole, according to some sources.
Spoiler
1 Like
No no, its still br placed.
So the Concept 3 will stay in the WWII bracket.
The Concept 3 was made around the time of the Abrams though?
1 Like
No, never
1 Like
is there any chance we get the trailer today ?
I dont know.
And is as useful as a panzer 3 would be at 10.7
extremely low
usually trailers come on thursday
No, probably not even a devblog - its monday.
Concept 3 is cold war, it’s one of the prototypes for the Rooikat
1 Like
rip
the project was also abandoned at that time which should tell you that it’s probably not good enough for that time
That’s why it won’t work. The Concept 3 was made in like 1976, and yet it is a very mediocre 4.7 vehicle.
2 Likes
It will work.