Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Why drag germany and italy into this though?
Germany now has an F-18C as complement and Italy has a Gripen.
They offer sufficient alternative grind options.

Even at full strength, CAPTOR-M will be outclassed by AESA and given its taken 8 months to get a passable generic M-Scan. Im not holding breath for full strength CAPTOR-M Anytime soon . It being left without AESA purely down to spite, just feels unfair.

Especially if/when everyone else gets better performance aircraft. At this rate, wouldnt be surprised if they argue the EFT in its current state was “fine” vs F-22s

2 Likes

If y’all don’t stop arguing, I’m posting light mode images

3 Likes

Because its about this:

The ONLY option for Germany and Italy for AESA is Typhoon. They have no alternatives. (not even via their current sub-TTs)

If they both get AESA on their EFTs, Britain Naturally will as well.

So EFT being denied AESA out of pure spite by the sounds of it. Would affect Germany and Italy more as Britain can get AESA equipped airframes from elsewhere if truly needed.

And again, If Rafale and Gripen E are fine with AESA, then so should the EFT

4 Likes

This will defo happen though because we have clueless people pushing for more and more advanced stuff with balance being a secondary thing.
How about argue with those people though, you’re knocking on the same door a little too much at this point and you’ve defo been heard, at least here

1 Like

The Japanese 155mm thing with the 15kg HE shell was fun but i haven’t played it in forever because like you said it became stale quick. I have the 2S19s unlocked and can get the PzH-2000s very quick but will probably wont ever touch either because i am expecting them to play exactly the same. I am expecting the M55s to be even more braindead easy to play due to just being 8 inch HE throwers.

1 Like

Unironically would be lol.

The early F-22 doesn’t have HMD and weights about the same as a multy story car park with relatively weak engines for its weight.

Heavier than a SU-35 less thrust than a SU-35

and it only got AIM-9M’s early? I might be wrong about that one tho

Read above regarding AESA. It just sounds like people wanting to deny the EFT fixes or even buffs, simply out of spite.

But its time for Typhoon buffs. There are aspects that are simply untennable to be left in their current state like BOL and Brimstones.

2 Likes

errrrrrrr

2 Likes

It weighs more than a SU-35 and has less thrust.
aka a brick with thrustvectoring

The whole point of SPGs and autocannon spammers, in my opinion, is to punish sweats who play vanilla MBTs. It’s like a public service.

Nobody here wants to deny anything to anyone, get that out of your head.
There’s stuff lower down with available documentation that gets fixes denied on a purely subjective basis, where’s the cope about that?
We’re reaching a point where reliable documentation is hard to get or is hard to accept due to political/other confidental reasons. I’m sure other top tier jets are no exception in similar regard.
The fixes are down to devs at the end of the day and no bickering or yelling will get that done ( there have been and will be more of the dox leaks by the day, trust me).
Money is in the first place here, remember that

2 Likes

Or, and I know this will probably go against your britain suffers agenda, people who have actually multiple top tier planes realize the true potential of the EFT.

You have always had a “grass is greener on the other side” few on things, your recent points regarding the F-15E vs EFT massively proof this.

1 Like

Have you seen my posts about the Harrier and Tornado?

There is enough At least Gunjob submitted a detailed suggestion internally for CAPTOR-E Months ago and the CAPTOR-M is already 50% blue vixen data,

But the point doesnt change

If the devs truly want to give EVERY nation AESA. Then what could Germany or Italy get other than the Typhoon?

And why is the Typhoon with AESA more powerful than Rafale or Gripen E both with AESA?

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Look I get it, You cant 1v16 anymore in the F-15 and you are mad about it. Still doesnt justify the EFT being artifically nerfed. BOL is a total work of ficiton. Typhoon never used Brimstone 1s and if everything else is getting AESA, then teh Typhoon should also get AESA. Simply. Even you can understand that

3 Likes

Now give me the unholy combination of both

Distant cackling

Gaijin plz

7 Likes

Yes, pleaseeee

1 Like

oh ffs.

So I talk about top tier, especaily Germany and Italy:

The response is this. Where apparently complaining about top tier is bad because there is problems at lower BRs

I mention that I ahve compalints regarding lower BR stuff as well. Like the Harrier and Tornado (which btw, the Harrier is in 4 TTs and the Tornado in 3)

and its

So what next?

If I mention the Soyuz is OP and really need rebalancing in top tier naval. its Britain cope ?

If I complain about the lack of ASB map. Its Britain cope?

Seriously dude, get off your high horse for a change

and again. people keep conveinetly deflecting the very question no one and repeat NO ONE has answered yet. Why is Rafale and Gripen E with AESA acceptable but EFT with AESA is not?

2 Likes

I cant wait for this thing to just tickle everything with HESH

(I still want it though)