To be honest south africa should be moved to Israel imo.
What? Why would that make any sense?
um GDLS makes them, and if BAE Systems Inc. isnt a US company, then GDLS-C sure as hell is not a Canadian company
They were very close allies for a long time. Developed the a bomb together.
~also apartheid countries~
Realistically its too late to move them, Chile makes more sense for Isreal
Personally id rather singapore, cuz im the og LatAm tree guy lol
if they only gave US LAV, and then gave the US LAV the camo, then that wouldnt be an issue
SK would be a great subtree but there is good argument for it to be standalone
2 Likes
Eh, think its safer to just give both nations their respective LAV’s the US has no need for a subtree. Makes nore sense to add them to the UK.
1 Like
I remember why I greatly dislike the Yanks.
For they always try to claim domestic vehicles of Canada are theirs or should be theirs because it uses a gear or something.
2 Likes
you dont need a subtree for them to add a camo
First time?
GDLS is a US company lol
I think you’ll be better at the sub tree for the whole reason of it will just be copy and paste of slightly different US vehicles if it isn’t
Eh, id rather the US get their US canos and for the Can Lav’s to get their camos on the UK TT
1 Like
Its not our fault gaijin botched britains subtrees so badly.
1 Like
Lowkey kinda unnecessary reason to hate a entire group of people, that sounds like somthing else that is not allowed on the forms.
Nope, every other LAV thread they claim them as something they made despite not even uses the LAV-I
They only started with the second gen of LAVs.
And then there is all the “parts argument” for our WW2 stuff.
but why add needless copy paste when you can just have a couple LAV in US, and give them whatever other country camo it can for anyone who wants to use them
Tbf not really, when the majority of an alt nation constantly screams wanting to claim another nation its pretty annoying. Not that you’d probably get it
2 Likes