Eh, if we use the vark argument then they can really get whatever they want. Realistically it fully depends on the snail, they could do what they did with the skink and just give both nations Canadian Lavs
Isn’t the Canadian lab just the regular lav 105 with the Canadian flag on the side?
Idk, im not Canadian
they really should not have gotten the vark though, that was a huge mistake
and i mean what would the point of US tt canadian LAV be, i think it should just be a canadian camo for US LAV since for most gameplay purposes they will be the same.
Honestly I’ll happily give up the Canadian tech tree for a South Korea or philippine one
Ajax and Lav are all they really need imo, at least in tech tree.
u mean standalone or subtree for USA?
they dont use LAV but UK does use Boxer IFV
Sub tree
UK has so many subtrees and other than south africa none of them make any sense.
Idk, Russia has Finlands camos for some unknown reason, i hope they get rid of them since they shouldn’t have them in the first place. Also cause it sucks to try to identify a Finnish T54 from a soviet T54 from a distance
I’m going to remind you guys the LAV-I uses the British scorpion turret. Heck the US didn’t operate this variant.
Plus the ASLAV and NZLAV exist.
The UK should 100% get the Canadian LAVs. Not a skin to a nation who they aren’t even domestic too
yeah, so the Boxer to UK would make more sense than an LAV since the UK army actually uses Boxers
To be honest south africa should be moved to Israel imo.
What? Why would that make any sense?
um GDLS makes them, and if BAE Systems Inc. isnt a US company, then GDLS-C sure as hell is not a Canadian company
They were very close allies for a long time. Developed the a bomb together.
~also apartheid countries~
Realistically its too late to move them, Chile makes more sense for Isreal
Personally id rather singapore, cuz im the og LatAm tree guy lol
if they only gave US LAV, and then gave the US LAV the camo, then that wouldnt be an issue