Doesn’t make it american either as it uses a different shell per his own argument, so once again hes hit a dead end
2 Likes
It is an American built tank, how is it not American?
that was developed and made by USA lol
what the m1a1 aim?
I’m not agreeing with him or you but didn’t the tornados use the 9Ls and 9Ms what about the EF with the 9m and the Aim120’s. The weapons it carries should not determine the tech tree
He himself said the US didn’t use that specific version of the aim, yet at the same time tries to say Britain or British subs didn’t use hornet, however Australia is not US sub, so wouldn’t the same logic apply
Yes
South Africa isn’t an issue really, given that most of their vehicles in game are unique and domestic or British in origin. the same can’t be said about India, but with only 6 vehicles the damage is still small, there is time to reassess
8 eagles excluding the F-15K, not 20
added strategically wouldnt bloat the tt
Britain has no subtree that uses Hornets.
3 Likes
Technically neither does the US
1 Like
that was hyperbole, you should try it sometime
Nor does the US
1 Like
If a nation isn’t a subtree, the vehicles operated by said nation go to the manufacturers trees by default
r we serious rn?
Yeah but it’s the nation that made it your using fallacies to make your point and that’s making people not want to agreee with you or wanting to compromise
hes saying the US shouldnt get the hornet since we dont have a subtree that uses them…
1 Like
it using asraams is arleady reason enough to count as a event vehicle for the US
because what else are SU24BM, tornado mfg and iranian F-14 besides smal armament differences?
The asraam dont make it an addition to the UK
2 Likes
we wouldnt be having these discussions every other day if yall bothered to play more than one tt, just go play US or Sweden UK does not need a Hornet
1 Like
hyperboles dont really work when talking about tt bloat (which is to be expected with the biggest air force and defence industry in the world) and placement of vehicles