So, it is effectively just an exclusivity thing, in which case there is absolutely no harm in giving a nation 20 subtrees, and then that would be my preference, that basically no vehicle be added to a nation unless it’s part of a subtree.
Equally under that definition, Pakistan and Argentina, among other nations, are de facto subtrees
Sure, but that doenst change the fact that this skin is in the (folder) for the Mirage 5F
There is what I was waiting for. You give a nation e.g. UK 20 sub trees people will be looking at why it is flying the Union Jack and not the NATO flag.
I never said otherwise.
Maybe I expressed myself badly, but my point was always the same: this was probably the officially announced skin for the Nesher, which ultimately never arrived.
while digging i also found out this exists yf4
Good god that looks horrendous. It looks mutated. If able to be armed it would make a good event vehicle
Pilot: “Sir our brick isn’t maneuverable enough”
Engineer: “give it canards!”
Again, if subtree is only exclusivity, then there is no harm in it.
As it stands the UK has exclusivity over 6 nations and near exclusivity on 3 more from my count
The US has exclusivity over 4 nations
USSR has 6
Italy has 7ish
It’s just not an issue because most of those nations only have 1 vehicle
Also, of the 9 nations I mentioned for Britain, only 1 is a NATO member and that is Poland who I would generally be against having as a subtree, given that they should form their own tree really
canards on what appears to be some type of f4E phantom so agile eagle upgrade or something XD
What nation is sub treed to US?
You put too many sub trees into 1 nation you kill it’s identity.
@Smin1080p_WT is this known?
Because now its pretty funny
In game 38+24 : has Richthofen marking
IRL: 38+24: belongs to the WTD61
Apparently Philippines, Iran and Greece, dunno what the fourth could be, but they aren’t subtrees either, just three odd vehicles in the US tree
South Vietnam, Philippines, Iran, and Greece
You spilt a country over many trees, and you kill it, besides the UK’s national identity already includes US vehicles and always has, so there should be no issue with Australia. If you want to argue identity then India has already bulldozed it, so there’s nothing to worry about.
Also, the concept of subtrees inherently clashes with national identity, therefore no nation should have any subtrees if that is what you care about
None of those are sub trees to the US. Why are you lying.
Sub trees are fine until they outnumber the TTs domestic vehicles.
before this goes on any longer this is the list of OFFICIAL sub tree’s in war thunder.
U.S.A. - NONE
USSR - NONE
Germany - None confirmed
Britain - India, South Africa
France - BeNeLux
China - Taiwan (if you want to consider it one)
Italy - Hungary
Sweden - Finland
Israel - None
Japan - Thailand
Nations that are similar in implementation to Sub Tree’s that have yet to be classed as such include
Argentina and Switzerland for Germany
Spain for Italy
Norway for Sweden
Pakistan for China
I never said they were, I said the US had exclusivity over them, you said subtree
and we should be fine then, given that the UK has 300 vehicles of its own, we could add Australia and Canada and barely make a dent.
Though objectively speaking, the nations with the fewest vehicles are the ones most in need of subtrees, like Sweden in 1/4 subtree roughly but they need to be
no
fym “no” lol
you cant just deny how things are. well you can but that’s just silly
