AGM-142 ring a bell?
it gets power from its own power plant in DC so idk what your going on about
Is that in game? No
Is there any indication of it coming to the game anytime soon? Also no
So again, just a worse 111F at the same BR. Likely would just be skipped if it wasn’t added to the british tree.
1 Like
i think it couldve been added later with the full weapons loadout but sure
I’m well aware, however if Australia in particular is ever added as a subtree, it couldn’t reasonably be to anyone but Britain at this point, so when we talk about the addition of Australian Hornets for example, the only place they make sense is Britain, given that the US doesn’t need Identical vehicles to what it has in its own tree.
If you have a read of the Australian Lynx suggestion, you’ll see that I’m fiercely against that being added to the UK, not because it’s a German vehicle, but because Australia never adopted it, like you said the Redback would make much more sense.
Like I said, there is an argument that could be made for Canada, but then the only other sensible option is the US, who even with no subtrees has more vehicles than the UK and its subtrees combined, so there is no argument for adding Canada to the US over the UK if we’re adding them at all, and if we’re not adding them then there is no place for most of their vehicles anyways and they shouldn’t be added.
3 Likes
or just added as skins for US F/A-18A, or even event vehicle with the ASRAAM for US (which we helped integrate onto their hornets)
2 Likes
just saying italy, israel wouldnt be the first time gajin just “removed” vehicles out of a a tech tree
or never added at all is an option as well just saying
1 Like
a la F-14 iranian yeah
2 Likes
Funny thing is your more likely to find Aussie’s accepting the idea for becoming a US sub-tree then Canadian’s. (And currently events aren’t likely going to help that at all)
I know, Canada to the UK and Australia to the US makes sense politically, but in game Canada is fractured, and Australia is almost all in the UK, and bigger than half the subtrees
Honestly that would be fine, so long as they took Australia out of the UK and put all of Canada in the space left behind
Or made them their own tree like they did with the two aforementioned
honestly wouldnt mind
but the benelux situation speaks against it
personaly i am for getting rid of nation specific line ups and letting us do world line ups but still nation restricted research.
Like that everyone could recreate their nations line ups even when they are added to developer nations.
Sadly people are still offended by this because they would need to research multiple trees still to be able to do their line ups.
You can never make everyone happy, no matter what u do
Both nations nation have similar amount of vehicles in the game, and yes well Canada has a few more vehicles out side the UK(3 ignoring the incorrect duplicates outside the UK tree compared to the Aussie 1) both nations still have their majority in the UK.
(Now if only that spitfire had the correct flag, then Canada could have another vehicle)
You mean US premium spitfire? Do you have proof it was Canadian service spitfire?
No, he means plagis spitfire
3 Likes
Mb then
Well yeah, if they’re going to shake up the lineup system then they may as well go all and fix the whole system so that every nation is represented, and nations like Canada and Australia can be researched from multiple trees, like how for Israel you need either the UK, US, or France, they could do the same thing
This, err- correction it was Prendergast’s spitfire. (I open the bug report and saw the other name)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vXREnNMT9pZO
I knew it was one of them i just picked the one people probably are more familiar with
1 Like
Don’t worry, I couldn’t remember what spitfire it was off if my head either, hence why I just said spitfire at first.
yeah, no idea why that isn’t already Canadian flagged
just more proof that Gaijin hate Canada I suppose :/
1 Like