a la F-14 iranian yeah
2 Likes
Funny thing is your more likely to find Aussie’s accepting the idea for becoming a US sub-tree then Canadian’s. (And currently events aren’t likely going to help that at all)
I know, Canada to the UK and Australia to the US makes sense politically, but in game Canada is fractured, and Australia is almost all in the UK, and bigger than half the subtrees
Honestly that would be fine, so long as they took Australia out of the UK and put all of Canada in the space left behind
Or made them their own tree like they did with the two aforementioned
honestly wouldnt mind
but the benelux situation speaks against it
personaly i am for getting rid of nation specific line ups and letting us do world line ups but still nation restricted research.
Like that everyone could recreate their nations line ups even when they are added to developer nations.
Sadly people are still offended by this because they would need to research multiple trees still to be able to do their line ups.
You can never make everyone happy, no matter what u do
Both nations nation have similar amount of vehicles in the game, and yes well Canada has a few more vehicles out side the UK(3 ignoring the incorrect duplicates outside the UK tree compared to the Aussie 1) both nations still have their majority in the UK.
(Now if only that spitfire had the correct flag, then Canada could have another vehicle)
You mean US premium spitfire? Do you have proof it was Canadian service spitfire?
No, he means plagis spitfire
3 Likes
Mb then
Well yeah, if they’re going to shake up the lineup system then they may as well go all and fix the whole system so that every nation is represented, and nations like Canada and Australia can be researched from multiple trees, like how for Israel you need either the UK, US, or France, they could do the same thing
This, err- correction it was Prendergast’s spitfire. (I open the bug report and saw the other name)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vXREnNMT9pZO
I knew it was one of them i just picked the one people probably are more familiar with
1 Like
Don’t worry, I couldn’t remember what spitfire it was off if my head either, hence why I just said spitfire at first.
yeah, no idea why that isn’t already Canadian flagged
just more proof that Gaijin hate Canada I suppose :/
1 Like
Behold
The US doesn’t need a Aussie F-18 for ASRAAM, it’s already integrated on F-16, just blocked for sale lmao.
8 Likes
But thats an F-16 not F-18
I need muh navy jet
It is cool though and I hope it comes at some point
nah that would be to much, giving every minor nation their own tree would be to much and would clock up the UI way to much.
Mot every minor nation needs to be represented in their own tree. look at argentinia like what 4-5 vehicles total getting their own page is stupid, and canada and australia dont deserve special treatment compared to other nations either.
To change the subject for a minute there is one british designed ship (not interested in who cares about naval) that germany could actually receive as they did briefly operate a few
A small amount of flower class corvettes were captured in france, rearmed with german weapons and briefly were in service
What is it?
German armed flower class corvettes
1 Like
Thing is imo, not every nation needs to be/become a sub tree/nation. We don’t need 100+ sub nations.
And before I get accused of being biased, yes I said the same thing about my own country before the benelux became a sub tree.
3 Likes