And they also decided that the M1A1 AIM should go to the US.
Fair enough, I misunderstood.
Like I said, I’m 100% for giving the M1A2T to the Chinese tree as they have a good connection to it (Taiwan being part of said tree).
1 Like
If i am not wrong the F-111 only ever was in official ise in US and australia the single reason uk got an australian F-111 was because no other country evee used it and there was no other option for a replacement of the F-111K.
It being australian had absolutly nothing to do with gajins choice when it was the only choice to throw uk that pity bone.
.it would have either been that or none at all.
It being australian literaly had nothing to do with the choice
1 Like
You do you bro.
Yeah, i sure hope my poll will change stuff!
That looks quite modern for a WW2 u-boat
Because it was modernised, thats why it was in use till the 80s,
But even without this it was looking very modern :))
Type XXI / U 2540
Also in game Type XXI can go to USA, Germany, Russia, UK and France
1 Like
Theres a few other examples, hms caroline and kommuna, as well as paneurba (i can’t spell that)
That is not an Abrams.
As mentioned a couple of times above, as of right now, with it’s current weapon set and performance it’s already sitting in the ideal position of any given vehicle on its BR. Not too high and not too low.
If something is done that would increase the capabilities of the vehicle (like giving it AIM-9L), this is going to drive it’s efficiency up and thus lead to a BR increase.
When a vehicle is near the center of efficiency on its bracket, thats the ideal place for it. So the developers don’t wish to do something that is going to knock it off a currently balanced position.
It’s not about what one Phantom has over the other. But how each one is performing in turn.
May I ask how the F-4F Late is doing?
(In ARB)
As you can probably tell by the recent BR changes, it was not changed. Indicating it’s performance is once again generally not in a situation that requires it.
The FG.1 and FGR.2 are incredibly similar with very few effective differences between them, so why isn’t something done, like giving one different weaponry, to better differentiate them and give people a proper reason to play both and not just one?
1 Like
Actually not realy, because as we see even vehicles which are doing Very good which could eazely take an BR jump dont get moved (Yes, I look at you 2S38)
There are a few different suggestion reports open for some different ground ordinance options that are under investigation. However for air battles, both of them are currently in a balanced position. So again, the Devs prefer not to make changes to vehicles once they are already in a balanced position.
Consideration also needs to be given to if one does go up, it’s rank may need to change. Which can impact available vehicles at a given rank and economics too.
I’m reffering to it’s actual statical performance. Not perceived performance.
If a vehicle was doing exceptionally well at a given BR, it would go up.
Ah, thats why the comments allways gets Liked to the end
Because its just an perceived Performance lul
Also, If the community is also saying its doing realy fine, why cant it be changed?
Like sure, stats are an thing, but does that mean the Community is less relevant?
6 Likes
if its not named 2S38, its propably the most requested BR change of the community only reason it would not perform as “well”, is because its a premium used by newer players
2 Likes
No, you’re right it isn’t. For some reason I thought it was, but it was just based on Abrams designs.
This is too complex for Gaijin. K/D is what you get, take it or leave it. Doesn’t matter if a vehicle had 100 or 100M games played in the last year. Doesn’t matter that the average k/d of person using it is 3 or 0.5. Statistics have spoken.
Global vehicle statistics is the only holy number Gaijin has besides the max allowed RP/h (they have this one framed in the office)
19 Likes