I think if a vehicle had relevance to a country historically, it is worth adding even if it isn’t necessarily British. Such as the Sherman II or the M109A1. I would even support a British Sabre.
I do agree about the OSA and Strela, nothing burger additions.
But to be honest I don’t even think Gaijin knows what they’re doing and break their own rules all the time. Such as the F-111C being in the British tech tree.
Or a joint Canada-ANZAC one.
Your 4-lines of air would help greatly. As Canada struggles in the air, strong on the ground, well the ANZACs are the other way around, good in the air, struggles on the ground.
(yes, I have maked a 5-lined Canada air-tree, but does not stop the fact, that the extra jets are needed, and the ANZAC prop fighters can help with the gaps there)
The Tam is german developed genius lol.
We helped a good part in its development.
Arguably the modernisations that arent in game yet could go to israel since they had a lot of part in it themself
TAM can be a seperate case since it was based off of marders, but a hunter - the best hunter in game - has no right to be in the German TT. Most other reskinned premiums or events remained in the tree that designed it, such as the M1A1 AIM, or leopard 2A4M CAN, but when it comes to British designs, its not always the case.
Still, by the logic you yourself provide as germany never actually operated them
I never said or claimed that being a requirement.
Its a german developed vehicles thats why german csn ask for them.
If with operation you mean australia kf41.
Its a private venture by rheinmetall that joined a competition. It was german development.
Trialed by australia. But australia declined the kf41. They never operated it and neither did they develop it. As such their claim is lower as gwemans claim for it. But the korean redbsck that wont the competition could very well go to the UK. Its a vehicles whose developwr nation is not in the game yet either as a subtree
That Hunter should go wherever Switzerland goes. Not to the UK because it’s a Hunter.
To be fair germany never actively asked for that one. It came to our suprise just as much as to you. And i agree that until switzerland doesnt get declared a subtree it should have gone to the UK rather
Switzerland was added the second they added one of their vehicles. Regardless of whether it was an official “sub tree”. Why would the UK get a Swiss vehicle?
Sub trees lock vehicles into one nations.
If they are not subtrees they go where they fit best. It ciuld have gone to UK no problem
Severely flawed logic, but whatever.
Not realy.
I am constant. I apply everything i claimed to canada, australia, uk. To germany and other as well.
If i wouldnt do that it would make me a hypocrite
Argentinian and polish vehicles go wherever as well.
You think I have done differently? Operator nations stay in one tree, never to be split up. Did I just exhibit a different viewpoint for the Swiss?
Single issue that your operator view point just doesnt exist in wsr thunder outside of official main tree and subtree nations.
You cant add everything and make everyone happy.
Your “rules” viewpoint doesn’t exist either, just flexible guidelines that Gaijin bend as they see fit.
However you wana call it i still follow the current modt recent guidelines.
Change them and i will change my attitude toward it as well.
Right, follow the guidelines you like, ignore the ones you don’t, since there are multiple ways things have been done in the game.
Not really, thats just how they go
rafale is allowed to have a better radar and FM than F-15E at 14.0, so why cant an F-15C which is slower than E (and 13.7) get its proper radar
answered it yourself