That is the dev team, not the balancing team. There are no vehicles that is inherently overpowered or underpowered, just a vehicle that is overtiered or undertiered.
1 Like
Which the overtiered vehicle mostly reside in Britain.
Ehhh i feel a grey area exists for vehicles that have such drastic performance swings that they can only be undertiered or overtiered
Like the A10C
Does that change anything? No.
Good point.
The A-10C is a ground strike aircraft, it is supposed to be bad at air combat. But it can be balanced in its ground strike role.
Its more of a compression issue, still, an issue that gaijin has to address and not something we need to worry about. If you strech out the max BR to 100 or even 50 with 0.5 each notch, most if not all vehicles will be at a balanced rating. But then gaijin comes and rebuttal with that long matchmaking argument which is just weird.
Well thats not my point. My point is in ARB its going to either be trash or broken
Because its a slow, fat, boat… packing features usually only seen at 13.0+
That’s fine, it should be trash in ARB verse other fighters. It’s not the intended role of the aircraft. That doesn’t make it unbalanced, that makes it accurate.
I don’t understand the false dichotomy between having sub trees and not having them. Add vehicles that make sense, where they make sense. Okay, UK has a lot of sub trees but what exactly is wrong with that? And why should that prevent them from receiving more vehicles?
@GTP_Paulie-psn there are too few vehicles to make a full Australia/NZ sub tree. Yes there are some unique designs but they should go to Britain preferably under the sub tree rework system that has been suggested
I never asked for an independent tech tree. Even my ANZAC tree suggestions for air, heli and ground are “sub tree” suggestions.
Edit: Just realized you said sub tree, and there are totally enough for a sub tree. Too many for air even.
I apologize, I think I misunderstood what you were saying
1 Like
I was going to stop but I keep seeing this pops up so I going to put a pin in it. UK mains means UK tree in war thunder not where you live.
Leopards beimg added into Germany? Yeah makes sense to me
lol, I just realized I said that too. I meant regular tree, I’ve had a long day and just sat down
Now we’re both getting wires crossed lol. I think we agree, not enough for an independent tech tree, but worthy of a sub tree.
1 Like
Thats where i recognise you from.
You are the guy wanting declined never operated australian vehicles into their tree
1 Like
Its always the rhetoric that, will this make the tree less British and delay British vehicles in the future? One of the only advantages or features that the British tree can objectively proclaim is that its tree is almost entirely indegnious, with very little copied vehicle.
And there are vehicles that just felt out of place like the bhishma, osa or strela. These are machines who in any alt-milhistory timeline will not serve in Britain.
So by that logic wouldn’t the tam in Germany also be unable to remain there, as it isnt a german vehicle?
Wait so if 16/17 of the ANZAC vehicles already in the game are in the UK tree and I play those the most, that makes me a UK main (fair up to this point, I agree).
But if I ask for more ANZAC vehicles I’d like to play and I want them in the same tech tree as my other vehicles, that makes me a UK main asking for “the world” and therefore a greedy person? LMAO
1 Like