I never said or claimed that being a requirement.
Its a german developed vehicles thats why german csn ask for them.
If with operation you mean australia kf41.
Its a private venture by rheinmetall that joined a competition. It was german development.
Trialed by australia. But australia declined the kf41. They never operated it and neither did they develop it. As such their claim is lower as gwemans claim for it. But the korean redbsck that wont the competition could very well go to the UK. Its a vehicles whose developwr nation is not in the game yet either as a subtree
That Hunter should go wherever Switzerland goes. Not to the UK because it’s a Hunter.
To be fair germany never actively asked for that one. It came to our suprise just as much as to you. And i agree that until switzerland doesnt get declared a subtree it should have gone to the UK rather
Switzerland was added the second they added one of their vehicles. Regardless of whether it was an official “sub tree”. Why would the UK get a Swiss vehicle?
Sub trees lock vehicles into one nations.
If they are not subtrees they go where they fit best. It ciuld have gone to UK no problem
1 Like
Severely flawed logic, but whatever.
Not realy.
I am constant. I apply everything i claimed to canada, australia, uk. To germany and other as well.
If i wouldnt do that it would make me a hypocrite
Argentinian and polish vehicles go wherever as well.
1 Like
You think I have done differently? Operator nations stay in one tree, never to be split up. Did I just exhibit a different viewpoint for the Swiss?
Single issue that your operator view point just doesnt exist in wsr thunder outside of official main tree and subtree nations.
You cant add everything and make everyone happy.
1 Like
Your “rules” viewpoint doesn’t exist either, just flexible guidelines that Gaijin bend as they see fit.
However you wana call it i still follow the current modt recent guidelines.
Change them and i will change my attitude toward it as well.
Right, follow the guidelines you like, ignore the ones you don’t, since there are multiple ways things have been done in the game.
1 Like
Not really, thats just how they go
1 Like
rafale is allowed to have a better radar and FM than F-15E at 14.0, so why cant an F-15C which is slower than E (and 13.7) get its proper radar
answered it yourself
But why specifically the Australian one and not just the US AIM. Never made sense to me because the US could get either, but the AIM could have gone a few places
it shouldnt though. abrams is the only unique US production MBT in the whole game
id prefer a US AIM anyways, but due to rounds and armor that wouldve been top BR which isnt allowed for non-tt
1 Like
listen I want an Abrams in a tech tree that isn’t the U.S. for the simplest and pettiest reason imaginable. Because I know that no matter what nation gets it, it’s going to be performing better than the U.S. ones
So the U.S. players cant hide behind the excuse of “but but abrams bad!”
7 Likes
Abrams is a really good tank. Sure I think there’s a few things they should do to it (like removable ARAT II from the SEPv2, armor stuff, etc., as well as hoping the eventual M1A2 SEPv3 is ironed out/good) but it’s got fast reload, pretty good survivability, and it’s quick. Just gotta play it right as with any tank.
Just give it to the most hated nation at top tier