I don’t see anything wrong with it, it’s just that within the game it’s trash and no better than Puma
Even if it did have APS gaijin would choose the weakest version of it to add before slowly drip feeding other models or making them event/prem
different niches. the KF41 comes with APS an anticipated feature even if its not performing all to great right now. if added to the game a way to enforc/ fix performance again as well
okay, the Spike placement is (Interesting)
no APS? good, doenst work eiher on the KF41 with APS )))))
tell that gajin directly jumping to the 2a7v, or skipping multiple typhoons and rafales
Heck, Gaijin went ahead with an AESA-equipped Rafale and skipped the RBE2 PESA.
I still cannot comprehend why they didn’t add T1 typhoons and PESA rafales, they jumped to the late models and then refused to model them well, like what are they smoking??
2 Likes
Sometimes the snail power creeps too much
They didnt even give the Gripen C’s their starting radar as they all use the A’s radar instead of the actual radar they used when they were first made. A lot of radars that are older need fixing.
1 Like
Any news would come via an official announcement. Right now we don’t have anything to speak of on that.
3 Likes
Canada isnt a real country you are all just snow Mexicans fr fr
From the Aim-120 AMRAAM SAR. Came out in 2014.
I’m really interested to see how this one somehow isn’t proof.
Ngl most radars ingame for 4th gen aircraft seem to perform horribly.
3 Likes
The SU-30MKK would be pretty good for Chinese top tier CAS, if it gets added
I don’t understand why I keep seeing this claim everywhere.
I have Al-Khalid-I and I absolutely adore it, even whel I play it at 12.0. And, as far as I know, VT-4A1 is basically Al-Khalid, but with significantly better armor… so how can it be that bad?
Granted, it’s missing its spall liners like all Chinese MBTs (Gaijin, it’s been a year, are you going to fix this or what?), but, if it’s an Al-Khalid on steroids as it seems to be, I can’t imagine why it would be so bad that I’ve seen people claiming it to be “one of the worst Top Tier MBTs”…
honestly i am hugely dissapointed how gajin is handling spall liners, they implement vehicles like they want no matter in which state and if you report spall liners directly from dev server etc or reported them when spall liners where added they just dont add or fix them either way
Pzh2k, boxer variants, leo 2 pso all reports with spall liners acknowledged but not touched and added
they made it a feature which they add when they feel like it
1 Like
I’ve brought the Al-Khalid-I to go with the T-80 and A-5 hopefully ready if Pakistan is coming to China
1 Like
2014 means nearly a decade since the F-14 was retired, and I hate to burst your bubble but they don’t test missiles on aircraft retired 10 years prior, sure it could launch and carry them but that isn’t a concrete reason to bother modelling it in the first place
I just can’t understand.
They have numerous bug reports with sources, statements, documents, photos, videos, everything, EVERYTHING they could possibly need to add all the missing spall liners in one evening.
Yet they leave the reports “accepted” for months, and months, and months, and even well over a year now… and do nothing about it.
1 Like
Idk if thats better than gaijin telling you they just don’t want to add it. Not that its wrong but that they don’t have plans to fix the vehicle because they like its current state.
2 Likes