Luckly they didnt pulled that move,
oh wait, they did it actually xD
4 Likes
I am (fingers crossed) really close to getting an official Harrier 1 E-M diagram. I have been talking to the RAF Historical branch about a few pages that where photo copied incorrectly in the National Archives.
For the time being I have looked into CVR(T) and Chieftain models again.
1 Like
This would be a different situation entirely. One that has been detailed at length and not in need of discussion again here.
But we are in need of a part 2 for that perticular discussion with all that has been found/reported since
1 Like
Hopefully they accept it. But I wouldn’t mind betting that they will close their eyes and cover their ears and shout “it’s a lie” instead of accepting the report and fixing it.
Ugh, im getting dizzy, this thread is going in circles.
again
1 Like
Again? Its just the norm ))
1 Like
What about the Harrier reports Hmmm.
I’ve spent a lot of time researching so I can find good and credible data. The devs denied the time to climb report without even stating how they matched the IRL time. The in game tested time is a minute too slow.
It also takes over 30 seconds longer to accelerate to .9 Mach as also confirmed by a credible document.
2 Likes
Im not sure which one in particular you mean. However im 100% sure it has no relation to ether the EFT, Spitfire Vs 109 or the Igla/Stinger conversations or even this topic in general. Not that it seems to stop anyone here.
Any dev response to a report, once there is one would be shared in the comments of that report on the CBR.
1 Like
I want off Mr. Smin’s merry-go-round
On that note Imma stop scrolling and make garlic bread
2 Likes
The time to climb report was passed 12 days ago. Once we have a full response, that will be shared here: Community Bug Reporting System
With the R2Y2 getting the axe could we get a idea of what other vehicles are being looked at for future removal?
Its been like this for years (counting old-Forum as well). ^^°
3 Likes
If/when we have some news of that, well be sure to share that with as much notice as possible.
The R2Y2s are a set that’s been planned and spoken about for quite some time.
3 Likes
Actually I have been communicating with a Tech Mod who gave me the devs reply. The results they got are simply impossible as I proved here. UK-EN | D3951 | Too Many | Mix | Seller | 16x9 | 10s | .mp4
Getting to 20k in 1:50 as claimed by the dev is impossible even for the FA.2 mounted with the most powerful engine ever fitted to a Harrier 1 airframe. It took me 2:30 following the manuals climb profile near perfectly with the correct throttle amount specified by the devs.
1 Like
Hi, what’d I miss. More top tier “enjoyers” coping?
ah well, back to sleep then.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Are you able to bump this report? The F-8E and F-8E(FN) got EEGS added to them last week but it is absent from the cockpit HUD.
Also of the same nature the MiG-23’s had EEGS added to them and it’s missing from the cockpit HUD’s too. Here’s the report. Not actually sure when it was added to them since I can’t find any mention of it in any changelogs.
Also the MiG-21 Bison has the same issue.
2 Likes
The report has not yet been properly concluded and the response should not have been given until it was.
1 Like
From my understanding it was rejected along with my report for VIFF.
Ik, you’d think friction losses or the baring failing would have ended the spinning already though.