Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

a near endless reserve of copium keeps the machine spinning at optimal rpm at all times, maintenance is performed during regularly scheduled lockouts, when the thread starts to go too far off topic

2 Likes

Only two thigns I want:

F-2 or XF-2.

And higher tier Air Assault. Ideally splitting Air Assault tiers up at the higher tier and giving something for 13.0+ (but separated from those without all aspect and so many radar missiles).

One day they will remember PVE… one day. Maybe. Hopefully. Possibly. Unlikely…

1 Like

Hey, I forwarded all three reports, have a good weekend!

8 Likes

Ouch. You might be in contact with forum mods but it’s never nice to put them in a tough spot like that. Unless things are confirmed by official channels, you should refrain from posting stuff like this…

1 Like

Fantastic, have a good weekend too

Thought it went up to 1.82, if 1.9 has been done that would be amazing

A certain colonel in the USAF claims it can cruise at Mach 2 at 60,000 feet

1 Like

How to make sure a tech mod never communicates with you again XD

2 Likes

Yes I have realized that and do feel bad. Did not mean to get the Tech Mod into any trouble I did not mention them for that reason.

The devs have been playing with my reports and I do not think that is fair. That’s kind of why I brought it up. If a FM or physical model is so considerably worse than what it should be is it not the devs job to fix it using the real life performance data gathered. Its not like the information is from a shady place its legitimately the NAVAIR flight manual. VIFF was done using an RAE report and the Sea Harrier FRS.1 aircrew manual.
Yet the Devs still replied and closed the report (officially on the actual bug reporting sight)

Again I did not mean to put the Mod in a bad spot. Just want them to fix the so many obvious short comings of a FM that spans 11 aircraft in game.

If a reply is given, how long does it take before a tech mod publicly posts the response?

1 Like

So it could roughly match the Concorde at altitude? Amazing, thanks

Once a report is concluded, the answers are generally sent for translation and approval. Developers typically answer in technical detail (as they should) but often with answers not directly as they would or should be shared with players. Devs are after all developers, not public facing communicators.

So the time for an answer to be checked and approved by us and confirmed with the devs (that the details are indeed correct) can vary.

4 Likes

Man, I can’t wait for some leaks. 2 weeks, I think, and we will get some.

2 Likes

I’m moreso wondering if they’ll finally do a creep towards IIR missiles by adding the remnants of 4th gen IR missiles (R-73M and Python 4).

4 Likes

Isnt that the long range ARH missile?

Do you mean R-73M?

2 Likes

Oopsies, yes. Dyslexia moment (I don’t actually have dyslexia).

3 Likes

Sure, they will add it. (Gatewidth upon yee)

1 Like

So can we remove the TKX and Type 10 variants in game?
Currently they are fictional in game. If we can’t have a somewhat realistic representation of these tanks could we therefore remove them?

can somebody tell me what the hole is on the tail area of the Rafale ??


Both of these tanks are real vehicles and do not compare to the R2Y2s.