I am (fingers crossed) really close to getting an official Harrier 1 E-M diagram. I have been talking to the RAF Historical branch about a few pages that where photo copied incorrectly in the National Archives.
For the time being I have looked into CVR(T) and Chieftain models again.
This would be a different situation entirely. One that has been detailed at length and not in need of discussion again here.
But we are in need of a part 2 for that perticular discussion with all that has been found/reported since
Hopefully they accept it. But I wouldn’t mind betting that they will close their eyes and cover their ears and shout “it’s a lie” instead of accepting the report and fixing it.
Ugh, im getting dizzy, this thread is going in circles.
again
Again? Its just the norm ))
What about the Harrier reports Hmmm.
I’ve spent a lot of time researching so I can find good and credible data. The devs denied the time to climb report without even stating how they matched the IRL time. The in game tested time is a minute too slow.
It also takes over 30 seconds longer to accelerate to .9 Mach as also confirmed by a credible document.
Im not sure which one in particular you mean. However im 100% sure it has no relation to ether the EFT, Spitfire Vs 109 or the Igla/Stinger conversations or even this topic in general. Not that it seems to stop anyone here.
Any dev response to a report, once there is one would be shared in the comments of that report on the CBR.
I want off Mr. Smin’s merry-go-round
On that note Imma stop scrolling and make garlic bread
The time to climb report was passed 12 days ago. Once we have a full response, that will be shared here: Community Bug Reporting System
With the R2Y2 getting the axe could we get a idea of what other vehicles are being looked at for future removal?
Its been like this for years (counting old-Forum as well). ^^°
If/when we have some news of that, well be sure to share that with as much notice as possible.
The R2Y2s are a set that’s been planned and spoken about for quite some time.
Actually I have been communicating with a Tech Mod who gave me the devs reply. The results they got are simply impossible as I proved here. UK-EN | D3951 | Too Many | Mix | Seller | 16x9 | 10s | .mp4
Getting to 20k in 1:50 as claimed by the dev is impossible even for the FA.2 mounted with the most powerful engine ever fitted to a Harrier 1 airframe. It took me 2:30 following the manuals climb profile near perfectly with the correct throttle amount specified by the devs.
Hi, what’d I miss. More top tier “enjoyers” coping?
ah well, back to sleep then.
@Smin1080p_WT Are you able to bump this report? The F-8E and F-8E(FN) got EEGS added to them last week but it is absent from the cockpit HUD.
Also of the same nature the MiG-23’s had EEGS added to them and it’s missing from the cockpit HUD’s too. Here’s the report. Not actually sure when it was added to them since I can’t find any mention of it in any changelogs.
Also the MiG-21 Bison has the same issue.
The report has not yet been properly concluded and the response should not have been given until it was.
From my understanding it was rejected along with my report for VIFF.
Ik, you’d think friction losses or the baring failing would have ended the spinning already though.
a near endless reserve of copium keeps the machine spinning at optimal rpm at all times, maintenance is performed during regularly scheduled lockouts, when the thread starts to go too far off topic
