Since PSN is down since nearly 19 hours so PlayStation cant enter anything, when update on BR changes? :)
There’s also the Rooikat MTTD that is somewhat usable at top tier. France has been the nation with the fewest light tanks lineups that could join top tier lineups, and for a much longer time than Britain. Although now, with a “top tier” light tank of 9.3 max, they have the lowest BR light tanks, with France, Japan, China having 9.7 BR light tanks. Japan and China benefit from a very good round even at top tier tho, while France has a usable but not great round for top tier.
Its currently the weekend. So not for a few days.
Well, was passed allready some days ago )))))))
So, COPIUM :)
(Pls, I need the BO(PAH-1) at 9.0)
what do you mean you need pah-1 at 9.0?
tell your website’s programmer to fix it so nobody can do that anymore
All BO’s are 9.3 while the second BO gets better missiles, everything else is the same
So there are Literally zero reasons to play it
yes first BO have hot-1 while second BO have hot-2. there should be at least 0.3 battle rate difference
hot-2 is much better than hot-1
@Smin1080p_WT Currently the developers have an issue with EFT’s supercruise stated capabilities stated to be Mach 1.5, are they aware that the F-22 is capable of Mach 1.8-1.9 supercruise before they deem that as impossible?
And thats what I try since ~2 years in the BR changes…
Iirc they looked at it, but in the end they went for a longer range conventional aircraft, mostly from a cost standpoint, the Harrier’s are relatively expensive due to complexity, and the difficulty in actually flying the thing.
Thats american
The Eurofighters performance is based on all available public information and all known details that can be confirmed by as many different sources as possible. These are cross checked to ensure for example one claim about X part of the performance does not conflict with all other known details from multiple sources.
As for the second part of your post, its not relevant at all currently to the topic at hand. As with any modern aircraft and as with the Eurofighter, all aircraft will be created not from a single source or statement, but a combination of everything that can be gathered to paint the most accurate and feasible picture.
It appears that flight model developers need to take a look at other aircrafts occassionally in order to deem what is possible or not possible. For instance, they once deemed the Rafale’s flight control airbrake as “definitely impossible” until it was pointed out that the F-22/F-35 did the same thing.
So perhaps they should investigate the F-22’s supercruise claim before they deem the Eurofighter’s supercruise as “definitely impossible”. It is the case that devs do investigate what is possible on other unrelated aircrafts that would affect or determine the possibility for a particular aircraft.
This would be incorrect. It was fixed as there was far more sources and contextual evidence included in the second report, both in the report and comments (which you have entirely cropped out here) and there was further internal investigations done by the developer working on it in order to make it possible. It was not fixed because “F-22 and F-35 does the same thing”. The dev answer was also referring to what’s “impossible” in game based on how airbrakes / canards were set up, not what was possible in reality, however that was more a case of the answer not being translated in the most clear way. Something which we are now rectifying on as many future dev comment responses to reports as possible.
The F-22s performance has no relation to the EFTs performance. This would be like saying the Spitfire is incorrect because the Bf 109 can do X.
Smin every time he visits the R&R topic
The Rafale seems to be Gaijin’s priority aircraft with how many reports on it get accepted and fixed.
Still waiting on HUD radar lock boxes for the AV-8B+, F-4S. HMD radar lock boxes for the F-16’s, F-15’s. Ayit HUD to be added, EF to get any fix at all, Harrier HUD to be added and the bug reports in this topic to not be dismissed and not believed (Technical mods say the sources are accurate, Devs say they are lies.)
Also on the HUD/cockpit issues I have made a list of 72 reports which have either been ignored, accepted for months or that have been lied about being fixed. Some of these reports are years old and yet the Rafale reports last seconds until they get accepted.
Or stingers can’t do X because the IGLA can’t
That’s is essentially an early US Calliope.