So that makes it not historical
For all we know it could’ve collapsed on itself, I can make a blueprint for a tank with a 7 barrel 120mm hand cranked Gatling gun and it’d be just as real as the Japanese ones
1 Like
Okay. P1000 ratte when?
1 Like
The pure Wot fiction yes i agree.
but some of them not.
Ho-Ri is pretty fictional, so is AJ, and so is r2y2 which is being removed
And you went back again.
Yeah they’re all fictional so should be removed? Nothing really wrong with that?
Problem is whether it gets its irl weight or not. If its 11.0 and has its heavier weight then it will bleed even more than it already does. Tbf it seems pretty bad, if its gets Jato and other ground strike munitions it might be somewhat useful but honestly seems like a worse option when the F16AM couldve been added with 3x penguin and actually helped the add variety to air.
It seems like s sidegrade to the f5e so 11.0 seems fair to me.
You argue so strongly for things like the YF-23 to be added, even with fictional capabilities, despite it not being needed in the slightest.
The AJ filled a major gap in the Japanese tree, it was needed, and it probably will get removed, but it’s already here, they may as well wait until after the F-2 is added, for an actual Japanese Viper to always be in the tree
The way you act is entirely selfish, everything for you and not even the slightest bit regard for anyone else, what harm is the F-16AJ doing you that you so vehemently need it removed right this second?
5 Likes
This is a ridiculous statement, because first of all designs that moved up to get the detailed stage where studied by engineers extensively to be sure they are viable, the crazy designs of ww2 where either vague proposals or didn’t go past the first deign stages because people knew physics back then. Second of all you can easily study their blueprints and designs to see if they are viable with modern computer tools.
Asking for very reasonable, detailed designs like the Ho-Ri variants is not like asking for the P1000 ratte…
2 Likes
Again worse flight performance with no radar gun sight? Idk i think id take the F5E since radar gun sight is a huge advantage
but you have no pd so it cant lock anything that chaffs and they can just fly low. F5e will probably be stronger overall, but 11.0 seems fair for what seems like an f5a/c with aim9l.
That’s some good editing lol
would be really cool tho
its fake?
Yes pls right beside all the classified modern tanks with completely fake stats fighting in a moba map with skyscrapers, people who think this game is some historical archive are hilarious
I don’t ask for radar (didn’t have it)
The weapons bay was made and provision for missiles (like AIM-9)
The jet itself existed and flew ofc
Again without the speed 9L’s get relegated to the same purpose as aim 9E and J which is trying to slow targets down but now without the speed or radar sight you have worse performance. Again i think this thing is more so a worse vehicle at 11.0 but i dont think it should go down. I just cant see this thing being a good aircraft unless it has something actually useful outside of flare hungry L’s
I hope they didnt bring pantsir to every TT in my opinion this type of filling the ranks destroyes the whole point of RB if every nation has the same vehicles. It is already to much with every nation having T 72, Leo, F 16 etc
The aircraft was never capable of using either of its internal bays, by giving it weapons you give it fictional capabilities, the only kind of weapons test they did was an acoustic one
1 Like