They have a longer guidance delay than 9Ls but are also faster off the rails. Which both makes the delay worse and them more potent than 9Ls. So once you accomodate the delay by firing a little further away, they do pull better and are half decent. But im not sure if I consider them truly superior to the Aim-9L. More of an overall side-grade to them. Different, and better in someways but equally worse in others.
With that in mind, why the AMX A-1A is a higher BR than the AMX or Buc S2B is a totally mystery to me and yeah, Even at 10.7 I wouldnt bother using it in RB, its okay in SB and 11.0 will help a bit, but its hard to justify using it over the Buc S2B at 10.7 which has equal bomb load, equal RWR but has a radar and is faster
Can’t believe they are going to keep RN Ghibli at 4.0, this is so retarded, it’s probably the most overtiered vessel I’ve seen in WT.
Yeah, they usually skip all the naval related feedback, but, I mean… this is such an obvious case.
Eh… even then, the sheer volume of fire than an Altanta can put down range is enough to cause serious damage to most Heavies. Or at least any in the British tree and I suspect most in other trees too. It may only have 5" guns but 2 rounds every second or so is enough to fairly permamently surpress anything smaller than a battleship and do some meaningful damage, maybe even enough to sink them. Whilst I agree compression is pretty bad. Atlanta is one of the best light cruisers in the game at the moment
I think the main issue of British cruisers is most of the crew members were not under armor protection. Even the DD can damage then seriously, the same issue also happened on most of IJN’s cruisers, but not for US and German heavy cruisers, unless approaching to 7km.
