Oh good. Just like the av-8b.
5 Likes
Holy moly, Smin
Don’t spill too many beans!
The gnat is where the gnat is because the gnat isn’t where it isn’t
1 Like
Its not really the same calibre of comparison, much like the F-5 too.
5 Likes
Strv 122 on release had some huge trade offs. Ridiculous repair cost about 18-20k sl
38k strv 101 ptsd
And they were limited to DM 33 now the trade off for the 2a7 and 122’s is slightly better hull armor on the strv but worse round, worse thermals, less smoke.
But bigger armored leo lineup ect.
Absolutely crushed the hopes of the some toxic German mains
10 Likes
Well, guess we know where it isn’t, which would be War Thunder
1 Like
AHEM
Spoiler
plen go neoom
3 Likes
Smin i have question about a certain finnish heavy tonk :3
Can you name another vehicle that isn’t being added in the upcoming update?
Or Luxembourg, they don’t like gnats there
2 Likes
Who the hell were the British fighting in Canada then???
Themselves
1 Like
Me.
3 Likes
An absolutely gorgeous photo of the vessel. The Tennessee and Colorado classes in particular look so powerful with their wide beam and comparatively smaller turrets… it really does look like a fortress at sea.
I don’t think we’re likely to get a second devblog today, but I wouldn’t say no to it…
1 Like
The first Strv 122A was released when most tanks only had DM33, 3BM42 and M829 anyway.
Also a tradeoff with the 2A7 doesn’t matter when both of them are just so much better than everything else.
If Gaijin were to add the Lun to War Thunder, how would they do it?
Would it be considered an aircraft, or a coastal vessel?
Yeah but people only want to compare leo to leo, i def agree they are better than everything else but we weren’t talking about others we were just talking about same vehicles on diff trees
2 Likes
I’d say coastal vessel
