sorry R-Darters that it also never carried
R-Darters are more realistic than the other things it has, however.
being able to carry 2.5 times the amount is not a few more
2 Likes
This isn’t a good example of “not in service” weaponary as their are countless examples of that across the game.
Every time the F-4F comes up it’s generally used as it it was some sort of exception when in reality the weapons are both in the manual and we’re used on German F-4F airframes I’m America.
2 Likes
Gaijin has limited the amount of missiles a plane can carry before and I don’t see them let a plane carry 12 missiles total
while true the only realistic loadout on the SA gripen is maybe the bombs lol
Yeah but those missiles will be mounted on an airframe that actually handles like a modernfighter instead of a skyscraper with wings.
Its T/W is higher. It pulls more Gs loses less energy, Has MUUUUUCHHHHHH better handling at slow speed.
All in all its a hugely improved airframe. Even with the same weapons loadout how would it not be an improvement.
If used on its own, sure, but he used this example alongside others to demonstrate a pattern, so it fits.
Hate to break it but it was just attached to a 2 year old internal suggestion for them which we already shared the answer too. It’s a balance decision.
1 Like
Why not? Everyone here is saying that the flight performance is bad and it has no a2g abilities. Giving it more firepower as compensation is just logical
the Top speed of an F/A-18C is Mach 1.8 compared to Mach 2.2 on the F4F
now load more and more Missiles on that F-18 and itll go down significantly
5 Likes
It’s a very particular one to pick in that case if not for the previously mentioned reasons.
why doesn’t gaijin add more late and early variants then? For example I would like a F-104G early with just aim9bs.
Could easily c&p the F-4F and give it aim9Ls at a higher br
I am aware, I just wanted to awnser to him
I know its unbalanced and unreasonable but in theory it could be justified
tbf I was just showing that there are a bunch of planes that have weapons the natiosn that used them never had, it wouldnt be unsurprising if the F/A-18C in swiss and finnish service were given loadouts the planes could carry but the nation itself didnt have
We already have an F-4F late and early as well as the ICE. We don’t need an F-4F Early Late and Late Late.
8 Likes
I’m not an expert, but I did read that the 18C can barely reach M1.1 at lower altitudes. Now slap 10 amraams on it and I think it’ll have some issues.
2 Likes
what about Tornado Late Late (I yearn for the missile bus with ASRAAMs and C5s)
The names could be changed to what they really are, then, as they had names in real life that aren’t used in game.
This is the same for the Tornado F.3 AOP, being known simply as Tornado F.3 Late, despite there being the FSP after it.
2 Likes