I’m really tempted in my holidays to go to London and get a copy of that Range Table
1 Like
Thats my issue is I can’t get a digital copy, I know the figures but to make a bug report I need a picture as well as potentially the cover
and it will spawn with destroyers that will just instantly kill you because it will face US destroyers with 8 auto loading 5 inch gun and you have a single 4.5 inch gun
I want to try the Type 21 but I already know unless it comes with its anti ship missiles, it will just be fodder for destroyers
Yeah, unless it gets ASMs. but it would be a fun addition for dealing with aircraft. Though they arent very common.
Yeah QE and R cover 7.0,
Britain doesn’t really have too much that is 7.3 worthy though.
Nelson has 1 more gun than her contemporaries and much more armour until refits are involved. KGV’s have an insane amount of armour and guns equivalent to the current British 15", Vanguard has a little less armour than KGV but more than Nelson and also 15" guns, and then Lyons have the same armour as KGV or Vanguard and 16" guns.
Gaijin, but not Pacifica or the CM’s who have to watch it go down
I wish they had originally had no plans for Canadian Leo’s and leaked the 2SG/Revolution first
1 Like
speaking of the costal disparity why is the Freccia 4.7, when the jaguar is 4.0? sure the Freccia can have 3 40mm but it has to scarifies the ability to kill any destroyers at all, and at 4.7 you will always see light cruisers and a ton of destroyers, meanwhile the Jaguar has 2 40mm with a faster reload and they have 4 torpedo instead of just 2. I think the Freccia sits at 4.7 still because it used to be able to absolutely melt destroyers but ever since they changed damage models it should really be moved down to 4.0
The only people losing the Leo argument is Canadian’s.
The only people the Germans are glouting at is Canadians.
Acting like they are superior as they use the Canadian Leo to hunt only Canadian ADATS(the they woud serve with) and run with things not used be Canada.
2 Likes
If they added the Leo 2SG i would’ve been fine if it went to Germany, Britain, Israel or even Japan.
Why not 2 CAN then?
That does confuse me both are via the same argument?
Did I miss anything important or noteworthy these past 2 days, or can I come back tmrw :)))
1 Like
Idc about the 2 CAN lol, not my nation’s tank
1 Like
Nothing happened, same old same old
3 Likes
Because it’s a “collectors tank”.
That why the UK shouldn’t get it.
Yet not only Gaijin has used the Commonwealth argument before, there is also Canadian ADATS they then ran with in Real Life is there.
You all want WT to be Realistic. Then you must only used things they ran with in Real Life even if that means you have to 1DL.
1 Like
Are you trying to start a flame war instead of actually being civil
1 Like
uk can get the standard 2a4 or the 2a6m for all i care, wouldnt u prefer the 2a6m for your line up either way
If one Leo must go to Germany all must.
“Collectors tank” isn’t an argument.
1 Like
Is it really a flame war if the placement of the 2A4M CAN and future Canadian Leos are predestined by Gaijin?
never said that, i said plenty of other times that countries should get the leos they used
its the reason we want it, its not an argument, the argument are all the parts behind it which are valid.
The only valid argument which the UK /canada has for the addition of the 2a4m can is that canada wants a coherent line up nothing more
its either they go all in with the Commonwealth tech tree and features everyone (Canadian Leopards, Indian T-Series, Australian Abrams) in the British tree or puts them in who manufactured them (Aussie Abrams in US Tree) and, to an extent, if they already have a derivative or a variant of it, put it in the tree that needs it more (ADATS)
1 Like