not much, just the normal Leopard fight
2 Likes
I would die if the AS90 was a premium
Damn, so who’s winning?
1 Like
Everyone but the Canadians.
1 Like
I still think the Bulk of Argentina should be reserved for a South america TT. Its a currently under represented part of the world.
But Id have no issue with Switzerland going to Germany. just drive me nuts that out of the 4 Hunters in game at the moment. 3 are virtually unplayable and they are all the ones located in the British TT. The one that is even remotely viable or competitive is in the German TT.
If they fixed our Hunters or added a new one. Like the one from Oman or Singapore that would be an F58 equivalent then it wouldnt sting as much
3 Likes
Queen Mary is going to end up being the new premium.
But at least it would be unique.
Probably. Though there is a hole for it on our TT. So you never know. But its another £70 i’ll be saving for another day :D
Unless she’s 6.3 she’s not going to be very good to be honest.
I’d rather they invested their time into giving us QE or R or the same for the Italians and French with Francesco, Lyon or Dunkerque/Stras
Basically anything that progresses the game. The time for them to accurately represent the bulk of the UK’s WW1 Navy is almost over with, I’d rather they stopped flogging that dead horse and brought out the Interwar stuff.
1 Like
Idk if I were the Canadians I’d be glad that our vehicles are getting represented at all, says me as a Singaporean hoping our vehicles even show up lol
Basically HMS Orion with 1 less main gun. 6.3 is where Id place QM.
But yeah… We need a good 7.0 BB maybe even about time we got a 7.3 BB
If there is anything Naval I want it’s costal to be less of a pain to grind.
I love spawning with destroyers that I have to use a peashooter to fight and in turn can’t kill. /S
1 Like
Yeah, also doesnt help that most matches are Gaijin-bots that reward a fraction of what a player kill gives. I get it. But it just makes the grind even worse. I want to get my Coastal sorted because im hoping for something like a Type 21 Frigate in the forseeable future but its so painfully slow
2 Likes
3, its not a big deal but I see there as being two.
Scharnhorst, Kronshtadt and the third?
I would say Alaska, Kongo and Hood are a step below, Alaska has poor armour and reload. Kongo Has poor guns and gun handling and armour but a decent reload. And Hood has poor armour (compared to Scharn and 7.0 BB’s), very poor gun handling, and not great AA/secondaries, as well as god awful dispersion which might be worse than 16" guns.
I know that already got answered but you can also check the BeNeLux tree suggestions :)
1 Like
I mean to be fair anything to entice people into playing naval more.
Hopefully with Split BRs they might just, just implement something that means they can decompress the BRs. Because idk about you but I really don’t want to fight a Bravy with my 4.7 Prop and my World War 2 era Destroyer.
which, let’s be fair, probably isn’t that realistic but anyway
The side effect is that QM gains access to superheavy shells which have much better penetration.
They are the same as on Iron Duke/Marlborough whereas Orion has the shitty versions which are basically just 12" shells.
But as you said she loses the 5th turret and so should be 6.3 as she also lacks the armour (if you can call it that) of Orion.
Oh it isn’t British 15" guns are the most accurate large calibre naval cannon in History and there are performance figures that prove it.
1 Like
I’m really tempted in my holidays to go to London and get a copy of that Range Table
1 Like