that’s actually so stupid the crewless turret has been demonstrated to be more versatile and better overall, does it have anything remarkable?. At least i hope this update brings some light tanks instead of pure MBT spam
In a role? What do you mean?
Why do you think that CVs could in any way replace BBs so Lion isn´t needed. Mind you even Nelson wont be much better then things like Scharnhorst I seriously doubt that Nelsons can in current game design be match to Bismarcks, so why precisely is Lion unneeded?
Can you explain how can any CV replace BB (because that is what you are saying)? How can CV reliably cap? How can CV reliably tank damage? ect.
1 Like
me too brother me too
a cursory google image search makes me think it might be a height thing. the Lance 2 turret is relatively lower profile compared to the puma turret, might also be the fact Australia had adopted it already, so manafacturing was already in place
The one in French service (which is what I’m assuming as it’s the most well known) is not stabilised, has no thermals and would be given OFL 90 F1. It’s a worse AMX 10 RC essentially.
well you see clearly british carrier had armoured flight decks thus they can just tank damage and stroll onto a point totally
fair enough I guess blame the french for it being meh I guess
lance 2 propably is higher, the boxer one propably will lack the muss system and the spike thrower system in the lance 2.0 takes a lot of space
i mean, the puma turret is actively being produced as well, and there would be the benefit of part sharing which is enourmes
the Crewed turret won the Warrior LEP mostly out of cost iirc, was much, much cheaper due to basically being a overhall of the exsiting turrets (literally just cutting the front off an popping in the new mounts for the CTA40), and took up less space in the troop compartment, (the crewless turreted canabalised a seat from the dismouts).
I hope so, I find MBT’s rather boring personally, Light tanks tickle my fancy alot. Personally hoping for a RCH155 for GB and a LMUK CTA40 boxer. Look I like stuff with alot of wheels.
Eh, I was just a tought, we’ll never really know unless we read german and the german MoD procurment team publishes a report
why do I feel german players might get annoyed about the UK getting the RCH155 if they dont also get it (they have yet to say they are adopting it so it would be the KF41 all over again)
1 Like
:sigh: yeaaaaah.
Would be great to have though, from what I’ve read it’s stablised and has quite a quick reload for a 155, Tall though.
(wow my dyslexia is out in force tonight, apolgoies for any typos I missed)
G3G3G3G3G3G3G3
dont sweat it I also have dyslexia as well lol
Not the same. Canadian vehicles are added when they fill a purpose in a techtree, while Argentina is itself predesignated for addition to Germany.
We’ve been over this already.
I wouldn’t expect a battleship to reliably capture zones either. And no, AC 's don’t absorb damage - they send it out on a much larger scale than shells, at cost of a longer interval.
1 Like
i mean xD i am german and did read all the actual stuff, its stupid politics, even the general/units would ahve prefered puma turret etc. Same as the stupid decision to only get H145M everyone was against that as well
1 Like
So:
Can you explain how can any CV replace BB (because that is what you are saying)? Why do you think that CVs could in any way replace BBs so Lion isn´t needed?
Because I trully don´t understand why do you think that not implementing Lion because of CV is in any way viabla and fair. When the Lion is perfectly eligible for implementation.
4 Likes
Fair enough lmao.
You can’t argue that a civie helicopter with rockets and hellfires isn’t funny. Though I’m honestly suprised they didn’t look at the AW catalog or grab some apaches or something
its funny and a good support yeah xD but no way in hells is it a assault heli replacement
The mounts for rockets and such look like scaffolding lmao. Why are they dropping the Eurocopter anyway? The air frames aren’t that old are they?