no its actually against kinetic wich its honestly stupid how much it has against kinetic protection like absurd levels of kinetic protection
yeah tested by ADTU, on the FV103, so basically an Ajax since the programme is basically CVRT 2
BAE FRES likely to be event/premium/squadron with Ajax being the TT alternative
Don’t know how they’ll the Desert Warrior though
Warrior CSP likely to be a TT vehicle as well
its honestly sad that there are so many ifv the uk could get to help their top tier yet gaijin seems to just ignore them
meanwhile france with their highest /best light being a premium only
To my knowledge the first G3 was barely, barely laid down, like less than 1%, but that absolutely still counts.
The big issue is figuring out what her name would be.
HMS Garry III
yeaaaah, The BA really wanted something that can do 2.8 billion different roles, so compromises where made to retain the troop compartment for the sensor computers etc. (If you didn’t know the Ajax is based on the hull of the ASCOD Spanish/Austrian IFV, which amusingly caused half the problems with the bloody thing during trials, Spanish build quality isn’t great it turns out). There was a crewless turret designed for the warrior LEP, but the LMUK crewed turret won out and the program was then canned.
HMS Boaty McBoatface
2 Likes
at least if the leaks are true they should be getting a light tank and an IFV this patch both above 9.3
might be like the german Z destroyers where she just has G-3
1 Like
I mean, there a few prototype options that would fix the issue, and some are a bit more normal than stuff like the 195 or Armata.
Object 187 is always an option as it wouldn’t break the meta really
In role, as I said before. They play differently.
Like what ? It comes down to having a battleship for the sake of having a battleship in GB 's case, while for DE it 's having anything at all. That 's why the latter has evidence of getting the unfinished ship, while the former does not.
It 's Argentinian, which makes it German in game terms.
The current era of guided missile destroyers is only just beginning, but in comparative performance they’re showing themselves not to be sufficiently rated to handle battleships. Maybe later ones will be, but that 's after twin-arm launchers.
Sagaie would be 8.0 at best FYI
yeaaaaah, Honestly it’s kinda wild to me that a 38 tonne LT is replacing a 8 tonne LT. I know objectivily the Ajax has an insane sensor suite (LWS, Directional microphones for identifying the direction of gunshots, EW suites, etc etc), but it’s massive lmao. I really hope the MoD decide to pick of a couple of LMUK’s Boxers to keep up with the APCs and the RCH155s.
Wasn’t that another premium tho?
Eh, they where fake all the way thru.
I feel like I’m the only player with Dupleix lol
It’s bugged, even though it’s premium you still have to purchase torpedoes for it.
Pretty weird that Gaijin have only added to the French navy with German ships and copy-paste post-launch. There’s so many obvious picks that would fit fine into the current meta, Dunkerque, Algiere, La Galissonniere, De Grasse, Duquesne, Mogador.
i still dont know how germany went with the lance 2 turret over the puma turret for the boxer as well
there werent any reliable leaks yet, only faked ones soo… yeah
1 Like
I would like the leopard C2 Mexas and 2A4M as they are canadian then please, germany will never get Argentinian ships unless they have ties to germany as a lot of their ships are foreign ships they bought like their 2 carriers or that one light cruiser we sunk that was american
you do realise the uk has no battleships they built on the level of Iowa, yamato and H39 right? like come on you cant be this god damn dense
3 Likes
isnt the ERC90 not stabilised with a good round and thermals? the rooikat 76 is 8.3 or is it 8.7 now and it would have better pen and post pen damage so I can see it as 8.7 or 9.0