Maybe Grom or Smin can enlight us with information.
This so we can have a more realistic debate to what might come in the near/late future.
Perhaps not ask them directly, maybe more veiled. Something like…“is there a politico-economic union coming as a subtree where 2 out of 3 countries pride them selves on different types of waffles?”
1 Like
is there a politico-economic union coming as an independ TT where 2 out of 3 countries pride them selves on different types of waffles?
1 Like
It 's certainly possible from a technical perspective that they could hard-enable sights-from-optics in modes other than SB, but I can’t think of any time when they’ve expressed the will to actually do so.
If Option One on the damage-modelling poll passes, maybe it could be part of increasing the detail of damage effects to auxiliary systems - forced-sights that become no-sights when destroyed.
But I’m clearly biased when it comes to this topic, since I play w/ historical sighting location voluntarily enabled even when I’m not playing GFSB.
Speaking of historical sights, I’m still holding out for the possibility of the sighting grids and cupola periscopes from Enlisted being transferred here to WT:
They recently transferred Enlisted 's more detailed aircraft turret views for some shared planes, so it 's seemed more possible than before. And it 's not like they haven’t added historical sights to the base game before, the P.40, T-62 and T-64A already have theirs.
1 Like
Today I learned T-62 and T-64 have had historical sights for years! O.O
1 Like
The P.40 also has one, I just wasn’t able to quickly find an image of it. Which is a shame, since it 's probably the one I’ve used the most.
the Jag is sort of a mixed bag
im still struggling to spade mine but I believe once I have it should be pretty nice for ground RB
it’s one of those planes that’ll majorly benefit from separated BRs
Yeah it should.
I think i might use it if/when we get a SB bracket where 11.0 is top. But right now, I dont massively see the point. Its a good aircraft though if you dont have the British Air tree researched, which is why I think it was added. As Britain has no premium CAS aircraft available to “skip” the air tree if you want top tier CAS
Wasn’t it Chinese? (Taiwan)
It was China. correct.
Japan already has the one they are adding.
(tho the US doesn’t)
I have no problem understanding Belgians talking French. It’s like US/UK, some differencies but you understand everything.
I have more problem with French Canadians, wich is probably closer to the “someone from Essex meet’s a guy from Yorkshire” for English people, even if i’m not sure about the difference in that example, except they are more heavy, and sometimes i almost don’t understand some sentances at all, but it’s mainly because of the really strong accent ^^
And for the few Cajuns i’ve listened to, i understand 2 words every 3 sentences xD
I can adjust my own accent depending on how much i want outsiders to understand.
It does?
No, the US doesn’t have a:
“P-51C-11-NT”
heck, it doesn’t even have a P-51C-11. much less the NT variant.
Yes, every part of the name matters in my work for an Air tree a single letter change and you’re dealing with a new variant.
example:
An “A-12X-CT” is not the same as an “A-12X-BT”. For WW2 aircraft all parts of the name are important otherwise you could be dealing with a different aircraft.
Does it need the P-51C-11?
No
Does it already have a P-51C?
Yes
The only difference is the meager change in kW
I hate how other countries are getting there Mustang variants they used.
China
France
Israel
Sweden
Who used the Mustang first ? Oh yea Britain how many have we got just 1 and not a brilliant one at that.
We were one of the main exports for it and hell it was made for us. But yea not even a Mustang IV.
1 Like
Ok but America needs another one that will play exactly identical to the one they have
The US don’t need another C they got one a unique one in fact.
Sure in WT the change is not all that noticeable. But in real life, it was enough to get a different name.
I was commenting on how the US didn’t have that variant that China is getting.
You can’t say the US has P-15C-11-NT because it doesn’t.
Yes, that’s what you implied to me.
The P-51C or P-15C-10 are not the same as the P-51C-11-NT they are not the same plane just the same family of planes.
But want you just told me variants are C&P.
So guess what the US doesn’t need the F-15C it’s a C&P of the F-15A.
The US tree it’s is a C&P tree. delete all Shermans but the M4 they are all C&P.
Variants exist but in Real Life, it was enough to be a different model.
NO.
Germany has nothing to do with Poland or that plane.
4 Likes