Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

It was China. correct.

Japan already has the one they are adding.

(tho the US doesn’t)

I have no problem understanding Belgians talking French. It’s like US/UK, some differencies but you understand everything.

I have more problem with French Canadians, wich is probably closer to the “someone from Essex meet’s a guy from Yorkshire” for English people, even if i’m not sure about the difference in that example, except they are more heavy, and sometimes i almost don’t understand some sentances at all, but it’s mainly because of the really strong accent ^^

And for the few Cajuns i’ve listened to, i understand 2 words every 3 sentences xD

I can adjust my own accent depending on how much i want outsiders to understand.

It does?

No, the US doesn’t have a:
“P-51C-11-NT”

heck, it doesn’t even have a P-51C-11. much less the NT variant.

Yes, every part of the name matters in my work for an Air tree a single letter change and you’re dealing with a new variant.

example:
An “A-12X-CT” is not the same as an “A-12X-BT”. For WW2 aircraft all parts of the name are important otherwise you could be dealing with a different aircraft.

Does it need the P-51C-11?

No

Does it already have a P-51C?

Yes

The only difference is the meager change in kW

I hate how other countries are getting there Mustang variants they used.

China
France
Israel
Sweden

Who used the Mustang first ? Oh yea Britain how many have we got just 1 and not a brilliant one at that.
We were one of the main exports for it and hell it was made for us. But yea not even a Mustang IV.

1 Like

Ok but America needs another one that will play exactly identical to the one they have

The US don’t need another C they got one a unique one in fact.

Sure in WT the change is not all that noticeable. But in real life, it was enough to get a different name.

I was commenting on how the US didn’t have that variant that China is getting.

You can’t say the US has P-15C-11-NT because it doesn’t.

Yes, that’s what you implied to me.

The P-51C or P-15C-10 are not the same as the P-51C-11-NT they are not the same plane just the same family of planes.


But want you just told me variants are C&P.

So guess what the US doesn’t need the F-15C it’s a C&P of the F-15A.

The US tree it’s is a C&P tree. delete all Shermans but the M4 they are all C&P.


Variants exist but in Real Life, it was enough to be a different model.

NO.

Germany has nothing to do with Poland or that plane.

4 Likes

Leopard 2 PL

looky here, a Leo in Germany.

A German Tank.

Question? dose Germany have anything to do with the F-16? no see.
Nore do they have any clam on Poland. Heck from the polish I’ve talked o that’s has bad a South Korea in Japan.

Bishma:

Hunter:

argentinian vehicles going for germany stated by Smin himself
Argentina:

Spoiler

image

Spoiler

image

7 Likes

For now. it’s not permanent and can change as there was no official Argentinian sub-tree update/announcement.

However, the question was for a Polish F-16. And so my convo was in response to that.

“sub branch” not really a subtree as a such but still

Ayyy, can’t wait for my Argentinian F-16 in the German TT.

M8 that a Leo that was modded for Poland as of now there is no Polish tree so that’s the best place

1 Like

Thought it was greek for a min lol 😂