Probably yeah, its probably going to be worse for KE and for reacting to multiple threads at once.
It can possibly go up to 12.0, but not like that matters. Your assumption is that the only vehicles it will face will be armed with APS, which isn’t going to be true, even if the Apache was 12.7
Im a guy who want my GR9A to come with it missiles working as they should
I was more suggesting alot of br adjustments for ground
GR9A as TT, GR9 as Premium
Good ending
4 Likes
Nederlands?
Or the Republic of Britain hehe
Schleswig Holstein
I’ll admit the 38T to Panzer is a bit of a stretch but he isn’t wrong with the rest.
With those the complain X nation is C&P “rules” a Maus is C&P of a Panzer I like shown here.
After all to them modified anything is C&P so is licensed built(or vehicles that are derivative from other nations despite being unique are all C&P to them)
1 Like
But I think that’s more of a you problem though as most people here knows what I mean and stand for
The claim that a Pz1 and a Maus are C&P of each other is such a bad faith exaggeration that its not even worth discussing. No one has ever seriously expressed an opinion even mildly similar to that. The sheer lack of nuance on display here means the discussion isn’t even interesting. And given that Gaijin doesn’t actually care what we think either way its also pointless.
I see people claim variations are C&P yes even ones with massive difference.
But C&P doesn’t mean Copy and paste it mean that people are annoyed.
1 Like
I mean they aren’t and I know that but if you were to look at TT suggestions elsewhere but here that is what people like to basically say.
I’m not saying the Pz1 and Maus are C&P but that is what people do to other nations’ vehicles which when applied to someone like Germany the Pz1 and Maus are C&P.
2 Likes
Who said it was 1%? Here maybe, elsewhere where WT players are(YT, Steam, Reddit, etc.) it sure isn’t the 1%.
Also, the Gaijin staff just ignores its player’s period in the first place. (consider of much of a fight it needed for them to fix anything)
I’m extremely pro-new tree and I deal with the 1% far more often then I should if it was 1%
1 Like
Even AGM114L is ok, it won’t be so OP, considering we have so many small city maps, and I am afraid it will TK many teammates if you just simply launch it without leaser guide.
I was mainly think about Brimstone but i think with more APS mbt it can be fine
But is there any evidence prove that Brimstone was used on helis?
No idea which threads you’re reading but I wouldn’t even say many people are making claims as mad as calling the Pz3 and Pz4 C&P. To be fair I only care about planes, maybe ground forces threads are nuts.
Ground tree suggestions can get very bad for C&P yelling even here.
I’ve seen people call up-gun tanks nothing but C&P of what it originally was.
I’ve seen people call vehicles nothing more than the variants of said vehicle when said vehicle is a variant of the one they are calling variant. (LAV-III and Stryker)
Or trees that have a family of vehicles be nothing but C&P because it has all the different WT possible variants related to that nation.
1 Like