Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

But Romania is basically confirmed to already be apart of Italy.

But since Czechoslovakian tanks and SPAA’s were widely used by Yugoslavia it would kind make sense to put them in there.

Since relationships are kinda useless in WT as it’s not nothing to do with Politics

So long as there’s no sub-tree anything is possible.
Not really saying this should be a sub-tree for Yugoslavia either, just what makes the most sense comparatively.

1 Like

Yea iirc Smin said in a discord post that more may come to Italy though I will have to find that again.

I though we where going with the Poland-Czechoslovakia idea?

1 Like

Scrapped now ;)

No, it really wouldn’t…
By that argument there wouldn’t be need for Israel since well, most of the late tier stuff is American with minor modifications

There really is no connection between Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia

Cough
image

Cough


bandicam 2024-01-02 19-30-41-721

2 Likes

could always go with more polish vehicles in the german tree, would love to gather all Panther tanks in one tree /j

Just as Yugoslavia bought arms from Czechoslovakia, some armaments were also bought from Romania, though to much lesser extent.
Unlike with Czechoslovakia though, Yugoslavia codeveloped things with Romania

1 Like

But yea Czech sub tree in Yugoslavia would be awesome too. As like I’ve said be for they widely used Czech vehicles so why not : )

Huge waste of Czechoslovak potential to make them a sub-tree

Well gaijin is full of disappointments so it would be far off lol

Doesn’t mean we should strive for dissatisfactory concepts

a uk SPAA just got passed to the devs

1 Like

oh?

Ru forums though so you can’t see it here
Британская зенитка - Передано разработчикам - War Thunder — официальный форум

Indeed there was a period when there was close Israeli and Turkish cooperation in terms of military technology, but again, given the political situation between the countries, it makes no sense to put Turkey as a sub-tree of Israel.

No it can’t, there are even fewer unique ground vehicles than Israel, and it has basically no unique air vehicles.

To say it has fewer unique ground vehicles heavily depends on what you consider unique. Both have a good theoretical amount regardless and I am looking forward to seeing Israel’s vehicles be expanded in the future.

2 Likes

Which ones “dont even exists yet” and are Purely Concepts ? As far as I’m concerned only three vehicles in the Tech Tree has not been shown in physical form, and those are TİYK Projects. Technology Demonstrator thing on the other could be partially true, but If you mean “mock-up” or non-functional vehicle by demonstrator, there is zero Mock-Ups or Non-Functional vehicles in the current form of the tech tree. There was Altay MTR which had mock-up turret but it is long gone.

Please do point me the vehicles which do not “exists”, I’ll more than happy to provide more information.

Let’s be real here for a second, that is true there are complete c&p M60s and Leopard 1s there absolutely no denying. What about the whole families of light vehicles though ? Or Anti-Air vehicles which puts even big three into shame.

You statement is not entirely wrong but you could make the exact same argument for pretty much all the other minor nations. Amount of interesting stuff surpass c&p M60s and Leopard.

Thing is only justified addition to Israeli Tech Tree would be Sabra, not even other M60 modernisations, rest has no ties to Israel whatsoever. Even then, Israel does not need Turkish M60T/TM or other modernisation packages since there is approximately six Sabra variation that is could be added and purely Israeli. If you are curious those would be:

Plus amount of Turkish vehicles would drown Israeli ones and Israeli Tech Tree would lose its identity eventually. That is not a how Sub-Tree would be, a proper Sub-Tree should support the main nation and fill the gaps wherever there maybe. Best Sub-Tree option for Israeli in my opinion is @Chilean_Thunder 's Chilean Sub-Tree Project. Again, there is no vehicle in the tech tree is related to Israel other than M60T/Sabra Mk.II and there is no other proper connection between Israel and Turkey at the moment justify such concept.

How so Turkey needs a Sub-Tree ? What do you deem missing may I ask ? There is two Main Battle Tank Branches, one Anti-Air Branch with not one but two top tier vehicles with different characteristics, a proper and dedicate ATGM platform, option for unique Sub-Tree and a Light Vehicle Branch with both tracked and wheeled platforms also different armament options to fit your play style. Considering our project is mostly focused on high tier and top tier there is nothing missing especially 9.0 onward.

Plus there is already an option for Sub-Tree, Kazakhstan. And unlike any other Sub-Trees, Kazakhstan Sub-Tree only has vehicles related to Turkey and/or Turkish defence firms. We’ve especially excluded anything that is not related to Turkey.

3 Likes

The what now ? Where did you read TB2 is related to Israel in any capacity ? Provide me any source indicating this.

Only M60T is related to Israel and that being said Israel do not need Turkish Sabra considering there is more than six purely Israeli Sabra models exits. See the list:

1 Like