There is no argument to be made here. None of the other Harriers or AV-8s are wired for twin rails except the Sea Harrier variants, whereas the AV-8B SPECIFICALLY has the capability AND WIRING to equip outrigger pylons.
those are harrier 1s
Same goes for the GR.7, yet it is used. This is probably the reason why they aren’t authorized, or usually equipped by the US, but the capability and wiring exists.
Thanks for the insult.
I’m not sharing an export restricted document, what I’ve said is already enough.
then you have no proof at least give a page number or something
1 Like
Easy with your AMX48 (never read something about that, except a Foch thing on WoT), in the same way the Leclerc IS NOT an “AMX56”, it’s 200% a wrong thing to say, it was a journalist thing (they used AMX, no number at all btw), never official.
(AMX didnt exist anymore today, it became NEXTER in 2006)
The first proto of the Leclerc is the MSC:
About Leclerc UAE, they use 3 diff composite packages, including AZUR, so we can have others kit there.
3 Likes
first one 714 of pages with no mention of the word rails
just give me a page number
Nice!
Gaijibbles, gib us the Laser-Mavs :D
I want fat mavs
4 Likes
facts brother, spit your facts INDEED
3 Likes
That mean might be lead-in fighter trainer (LIFT)/light combat aircraft and light attack aircraft from Alenia Aermacchi/leonardo ? Sounds familiar.
I’m a little worried F-16C Block 50 (USAF), F-16A Block 20 MLU (ROCAF) and AV-8B Plus (ITA) will receive AGM-65G from gaijin this quarter or second major update this year ?
3 Likes
Arguably D is the better missile anyway due to the heat warhead
Some evidence I think might have been found by flame for that actually
1 Like
would the Blast penetrators even be useful for wt?
TV guided anti helicopter weapon?
do they have a proxy fuse tho?
you can already use mavs against Helis
Not sure, to be honest