Ooook so Balance Issue F15IA to Israel XD 🤞
israel wont get a jet that wasnt even build yet
just like it wont get the Ah-64E before it gets delivered
1 Like
Literally just
- No dual racks as the only “evidence” is a wrongly interpreted picture of 2 R-77-1 on its underbelly
- Bars radar compatible with R-37 + higher max search range, not Irbis-E. Literally every search (including manufacturer!) doesn’t state it has Irbis.
And that’s it.
Some people argue the engines too but most sources in most places says it does have them, so…
- If/when R-77M becomes a thing, it doesn’t get it but I know the urge to give it R-77M will be astronomical
already explained multiple times, its a prototype aeasa plane that get tested
german planes are compatible as has been shown
specialy added was the version shown of from 2007
they essentialy added a prototype. A vehicle essentialy developed by south africa itself.
The gripen e thailand is not underdevelopment by thailand, as its the case with both examples you brought up, they are developments by their own countries with prototypes and steps being shown
The naval event is coming to an end in a few days. What will be the next event, tank? plane?
you should be able to answer that yoursel.
Chances are Smin himself doesnt even know about the missle yet.
It wont come anytime soon and likely cant be answered
malice*
Sadly for me, plane.
I’m still looking forward to that Object 640 :')
heck the development just startet/was announced,. already asking for it is a joke
Either name is correct, refer to navy.mil overview of the missile
Obviously not if they have rounds made and in flight testing
can you read? and still first actual flight tests can still result in many changes
Yeah and which specific Blk of MS21 are they getting? Are they getting the dual sensor array? What model of E are they getting?
You do know the two nations that have the Gripen E currently run two separate models of the Gripen E, so what model are they buying?
So, @Smin1080p_WT , I have a question. The leak regarding the Leopard 2A7A1 is pretty obvious; adding an Strv 123A for Sweden wouldn’t be the equivalent, since it lacks APS. The point is, a Leopard 2A8 and a 2A8NO for Sweden would mean adding APS for both nations—what is the likelihood of them including a 2A8 in this update? If I recall correctly, they kept the inclusion of the SEPv3 under wraps until the very last moment.
Imagine germany getting an actual vehicle at 8.0-8.3 BR next patch instead of those wessi unstabbed leos
so then you know its flight parameters
and under which conditions it can achive the claimed range?
we dont even know that for sure on the AIM-120D
Why ask for something you can’t give any stats on besides the name?