Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Hear me out. Give them nothing they already have 3 better tanks then Germanys 1 2a7V what is worse magically

2 Likes

The 1a2 and 1a3 should come with maybe the east German t55s and the gap would be fixed lol

We decided to exclude the PoBIT because we both agreed that it wasn’t 14.3 worthy.

And since rhe F-16V is mostly the same as or worse than the PoBIT, I extended that same opinion to it.

There is no valid leak that hints to the 2a7a1

wont be answered, but its just the easy thing for gajin to do

Generaly a Strv123A wont be added, you are aware how long ago it was even rolled out?
That is by no means realistic

that is basicaly no stats

I mean tbf it wouldn’t be hard plus it didn’t take 2a7HU too long to get added. The issue would be adding the 123A realistically forces a dm rework

First Handover was December 14 2023
Game implementation was 19 june 2024.
Thats half a year.
The strv123a was rolled out pretty much 2 months ago now.

It might appear in the last patch this year, but not now

mass, range estimate, warhead type, propulsion type, general dimensions, and we have pictures of the missile publicly available.

ah so 10g overload, 0,1kg warhead no proxy head, mach 1 speed

If you want to make estimates in bad faith go ahead. But we know about as much about modern SAM’s and the AIM-120D ingame

that ones based on the aim120 either way.

A lot of the SAMs are based on air to air variants as well.

For the iris-t variants i know we got time to target times as well (still underperforming).

The AIM-424-LRAAM is a completly new missle, you have no information to base it on and you are asking for its implementation day 1

Fun fact, the aim 260 isnt even anywhere mentioned to be close of addition

Other topic the Chinese heli changes were stupid imo

Moves 19e to 11.7 with promise of giving it more msl
Discard the msl change for BALANCING REASONS
As if the z10 at 11.7 doesnt alr do it and better in everyway
Oh did i mention z10 has akd10 and z19 does not

Mb there would be some point for me to walk into german rank 5-6 mb then lmao

Leopard 1A2 as a M60A1 equivalent. Many nations have an equivalent, but the problem is it should be at 8.3 despite Eastern bloc 8.3’s field APFSDS.

Which the 1A2 does not have

Edit: I would get the T-54AMZ at 8.0 and move Leopard 1(A0) to 7.7

T95E1 also uses APFSDS. And i don’t consider leo a viable choice in current meta of 35-mm SPAAs and light autocannon stabilized jumpscares. So i guess the easiest choice would be to give the germans the T-55A and call it a day, either at 8.3 or 8.0 considering that iirc NVA never used 3BM25, only 3BM20 which is worse, however, i don’t have any info on how much

Wdym lol it could definitely use apfsds only thing preventing it would be br. The main benefit of 1a2 would just be its stabilizer lol

This doesn’t matter. It’s a balancing decision. The nva never used 100mm Aphe for them but it would likely get it

Then C&Ping T-55 would be a thing, however, i’d look onto 3BM20 in this game as probably the worst APFSDS (even M735 rises above this, most likely) if added

Likely wouldn’t be added the current ammos would just be copy and pasted and also the leopards are fine tanks just the leopard 1 sits at a unfortunately br where alot of stuff is stabilized

Hey @Smin1080p_WT So as of now it is known that the f15’s in game aren’t capable of reaching their top speed of mach 2.5 of which they do in real life and is also listed on their stat cards. So I’m just wondering if this is an issue you guys plan to iron out or if it is intentionally capped at mach 2.33 for balance reasons and is planned to stay that way?

Marketing lie