Sepv4, US can get that, though it is most likely just going to be sepv3 with LWS, maybe gen 3 thermals, no smoke though :( (ROSY can be attached though IIRC) [ but still not a T-14 counter]
A big part of the current issue is that the game accelerated through the early and mid Cold War far too quickly to get to modern-ish tanks and aircraft
This has led to several major issues:
-
huge swaths of unique missing designs;
-
over compression as what vehicles that were added needed to coalesce to form line ups;
-
the current issue of having “run out of track” so to say, where while there is future higher tier content, it’s pretty limited;
-
a reduced likelihood of seeing many of the vehicles from (1) because so many players use premiums to push to the top of the tree
And while I point to the early Cold War, this issue shows up at 10.0 + as well. Germany still lacks any line up depth between 10.7 and 12.7 (event vehicles aside) and it has had the same end of the line tank for, what, 3 years?
2 Likes
Yep, together with decompression you also pointed out a true issue
Just as i said, they should focus on what it’s already gimped and missing before going to such road…
1 Like
Yes, I also think that more APS versions will come soon.
Then Leopard 2A8s too and STRV123A with L/55 are also likely to be added.
After that, I’d rather to see buffs and reworks for under-performing MBTs before another nation or sub-nation.
Before 2A8, it is gonna be 2A7A1
2 Likes
So as I said. APS versions are the best bet for next additions.
Indeed, They would be really useful in top tier against CAS so i do hope more nation get tanks with APS next update as well
MBTs dropped so fast that we covered till 2000s 6 years before. And 2010s 3 years before?
We can have 13.0 now, 13.3 tomorrow with new MBTs but it should go to 14.3 with necessary gap filling.
2 Likes
That’s optimistic, I expect SEPv4 to not even have SEPv3’s already underperforming armor, because “n-not enough proof” or something, even though the thing weighted 70 tons. It will probably be just a SEP but slower and with LWS.
That, if it’s ever implemented on the first place.
Bote
Well there isn’t a l44 one is there.
T-14 is a big unknown tho
IMO should be putted into the same basket as other demonstrators like Abrams X, MGCS or EMBT.
We have nothing but the promises in the brochure. I don’t want any PR-driven “wunderwaffe” tbh.
Sweden has enough trialed slop in their tree.
3 Likes
Supposedly one of the best US SAM systems in-game.
I wonder if there will be any new interesting SPAAs next update.
I hope they just focused on actual MBTs from once.
Im personally more interested about some form or air-defense for the US that doesn’t behave like a blind bat.
5 Likes
Well, 2A7V and 2A7+'s hull is the same; regardless, I just learned that it’s neither case, at least according to the image you provided;
Das Leopard-2-Fahrgestell des E-MBT entstammt der PSO-Versuchsträger-Reihe, für den es nach der Umsetzung des Leopard 2A7/2A7V für die Bundeswehr keine konkrete Verwendung mehr gab. Gut zu erkennen die 17/20 kW APU.
Translates into:
The Leopard 2 chassis of the E-MBT comes from the PSO test carrier series, for which there was no longer any concrete use after the implementation of the Leopard 2A7/2A7V for the Bundeswehr. The 17/20 kW APU is clearly visible.
In any case, those hulls have gone through a history of upgrades, hahah.
From Leopard 2A6EX demo, to Leopard 2PSO demo, to EMBT demo. At this point they are probably upgraded effectively to 2A7V/+ levels.
People: “M1A2 SEPv3 should probably be at least the 480mm KE value that had long been achieved in the proposed 1990s hull armor upgrade.”
Abrams haters: GHAHAHAHAHJA LOOK ABRAMS FOOLS WANT INVINCIBLE ABRAMS HULL ARMOR LOLOL
I also love how you suggest that “hull armor upgrades” DEFINITELY don’t involve the “LFP” despite the several hundred additional kilograms. Let me guess, those come from “a 5mm plate under the engine compartment”?
4 Likes