no but the US is getting another M series tank
Another mediocre T-series tank coming right up.
I’m not gonna lie, I wouldn’t mind if they started getting Armatas lmao.
I am beginning to thirst over newer and more advanced MBTs.
M1A2 SEPv3 and T-90M feel pretty much the same as M1A2 and T-72B3 did in 2020.
M1A2 “SEPv3”’s issue could be solved by actually implementing it properly, but I’ve already accepted Gaijin would rather close War Thunder’s servers than not insulting SEPv3’s existence, so xd.
1 Like
Wouldnt mind it.
But i dont trust gajin to reasonably implement it, while screwing over nato tanks
Still by far the best tanks in the game
Tell that the 2a7V which got worse armor then the strv122. Who got based on 30year old armor study.
While russian era got buffed once again for no reason.
And german anti era tip report got denied cause the developers dont understand german and we arent allowed to explain their mistake to them
1 Like
2 nato tanks. Problems aside they’re still better than any other tank in the game. 2A7/122’s, Abrams are all way better than anything russia or China gets.
Russia did follow a design philosophy of mass over class.
While western one was more about quality.
There is plenty of nato tanks getting screwed over. Its just the 2 with the most exports have the most known about them. Resulting in a better implementation the rest.
Point stands. Its not above gajin to bloat the capabilities of the Armata
If it were for me,
NATO tanks would stop being artificially nerfed and screwed over…
…yes, they would be WAY better than Russian tanks…
…which would be made up by these having lower BRs, lower SP costs and which is also already made up by them having the best Support tanks, best SAMs, best CAS and best helicopters.
Artificial nerfs should NEVER happen, much like they already swear to be the case.
They claim that they don’t artificially nerf NATO/Western tanks with a straight face while giving 2010s 67 ton SEPv3 a miserable 430mm KE hull still yet unable to even withstand 3BM42 which even proposed 1990s packages already could do; or by breaking Type 10’s transmission which at this point seems completely intentional since it’s been 6 years now and the fix is as easy as changing 2 numbers in the code like YouTubers, miners and even myself have done already.
2 Likes
Better MBTs ->>>>>> 14.0
Gotta love that the elde pretty much provided a code foe regenerative sterring but gajin ignored it cause players wont “like” it. Since they will drive so differently.
Never knew thwy cared so much about we like considering the implementation of the turret basket, which is falsy implemented.
Talking about false implementation and nerfing of nato tanks.
Gajin not u derstanding blowout panels
9 Likes
Russias military equipment is just kinda ass compared. Yes there’s the t14 but I don’t think they’ll come without the nato equivalents what would probably be better
Gajins volumetric calculations do not agree to your statement
I mean, what can NATO get now?
Leopard 2A8 is Leopard 2A7HU, but with Trophy;
Best thing America can get is another gimped SEPv3, but with Trophy.
Challenger 3 would be neat, but still a Challenger.
Leclerc XLR would be neat, but would probably be as gimped as all other Leclercs.
Even with marginally enhanced capabilities, NATO can’t look forward to anything any better than what they currently have, specially if Gaijin insists on the gimped depictions.
Regarding T-14, it may be one of the most… unique tanks to play.
Incredibly hard to KILL, but incredibly easy to DISABLE. A hull-down Armata may be basically invincible, BUT it would be really easy to disable.
Frontally, its hull armor would be tough enough to be basically immune, but the turret and gun could always be easily disabled.
6 Likes
Germany can get the 3 kf51s a.rc 3.0 and a few others. And they would all be better then t14
Capint. With uncucked ammo.
Let’s just ignore all the unique tanks that are available the newer ammos and all that and sure. There’s abosulutly nothing.
There’s still a ton of prototypes/demonstrators as well. Things like the KF51, Abrams X, EMBT and the many other similar vehicles would bring a lot more substantial changes.
Sure there’s nations that don’t have that, but generally I think there will still be ways to get new MBT content in some form. Sweden for example through Norway could get the K2NO, which while not winning the competition was still a unique variant made exclusively for Norway.
And even with no more advanced MBTs to add now Japan could see improvements to the existing Type 10 through things like a faster reload (could go up to ~3.2s sustained, maybe ~2s for the second shot) or fixed mobility.
1 Like
SHARD from Leclerc’s gun penetrates 640mm, so it would be far better than F1, but nothing groundbreaking. In fact, I have no idea why at least S.XXI and AZUR still doesn’t have it!
Sure, but at the end of the day;
-EMBTs are Leopard 2A7V hulls with Leclerc turrets and guns (still, GIB).
-Abrams X is a completely unknown vehicle to which Gaijin will probably give the M1 base 355mm KE hull and no turret armor at all. The best bet for America is probably CATTB, which would basically play like an M1A1 AIM in terms of armor and thermals, but with extreme firepower.
-KF-51 is the most interesting of the bunch thanks to the uparmored hull and 130mm gun, but nothing guarantees us its turret won’t be covered by 0.16 KE “composite screens” or “structural steel” lol. Still could be the closest thing to a T-14 counterpart.
I forgot to consider these vehicles at first, that’s true; but at the end of the day, I don’t think they would be as groundbreaking as Armata will probably be.
The community has been trying to fix Type 10’s mobility for 6 years but it remains unaddressed because the missing acceleration “is not a bug” and the broken steering is absolutely intentional, so xd.
6 Likes
France could still get this, it got passed not too long ago
2 Likes
There are quite a few exampled each aside what you mentioned that could give some sort of different gameplay
Imo just like with 5th gen for jets (that imo should never come but its not on topic) the devs should really rework most of the tanks that are gimped since years, decompress, do things that should have been done a lot ago and are long overdue…
Im not very an enjoyer of the reign of tech demostrators, single units or showcased vehicle that are newer then the dinner i had yesterday…but if they have to come, they should really cut the bs up and work fr to make top tier atleast somewhat balanced and fixed before adding vehicles this disproportionate
and maps that aren’t pityful please
1 Like