Both ready rack fixes alone would help tons on their places in the meta.
1 Like
if the cr2 got its ready rack fixed the black night would be a menace at long range
when gaijin when
I mean it is our modernization package we should get it lol we’ve been skipping a lot with our past modifications
1 Like
me to
I hope that Gaijin has finally realized that many players still want WW2 and early Cold War era vehicles. I really hope they give us the best version of the Ho-Ri for example.
I and several others worked hard to bring this to fruition, so read carefully please!
6 Likes
SEPv3 has both improved hull and turret armor.
You know the SEPv3 gets quite a bit heavier right?
SEPv3 is a 2A7/122 counterpart and thus should come to the game, however it should come with a new wave of tanks that is closer to the 2A7/122.
Those are all usually grouped as 1 (uparmored leos) or 2 (2A7s and 122s) entries in a ranking. The SEPs are only really worse than these tanks while being better than everything else.
You will obviously disagree, but you have always been slightly out of touch with the meta (no offense). You overvalue armor like it’s the only thing that matters while ignoring almost everything else.
3 Likes
Can I talk now
Edit : that’s a yes. Not enough war thunder lately
3 Likes
It would be an considerable upgrade. We know for sure that it has upgraded composite while now there are also suspicions that it has more composite in the hull and turret.
Agreed.
However the hard pill to swallow for a lot of the community is that there are only really 1-2 top tier MBTs that come truely close to being bad, which are the T-72B3A and Ariete AMV.
Even stuff like the Challenger 2s are decent-solid and people doing bad in them suffer from serious skill issue.
(Inb4 this gets flagged by certain British mains for hurting their egos)
1 Like
So guys, what do you think, what ground vehicles could come next update?
And for naval fans: Please Holy Snail, can we have a laoding screen for the USS North Carolina like this:
would be awsome!
1 Like
At this point as a mostly high/top tier player I only expect disappointment when it comes to the ground additions each update.
EDIT: Well to be fair, the last 2 updates weren’t bad in terms of new ground vehicles. Just nothing super exciting or super hype.
1 Like
Praying for juicy Brit devblog today
… Copefully
3 Likes
copium…
Is that leo2a6ex?
I need something new and look at my name I’m full of nothing but cope for theses tanks
1 Like
Demo 1 to be precise
I merely value it as any other tie-breaking factor.
When an amount of tanks have similar firepower and mobility, then it’s armor and survivability what makes the difference.
People claim that the Abrams is so extraordinary because “it has a mobility and a 5 second reload”… as if 90% of the tanks in Top Tier didn’t have mobility and a 5 second reload.
Then what is it that makes the Abrams better than the Leclercs or Ariete AMV, all of which have the same reload and mobility…?
Wouldn’t that be… the armor? Isn’t that what everyone says, and for good reason?
Why is it that armor matters when it comes to pointing out that the Abrams is better tha’ the Leclercs or Ariete AMV because if it…
…but, suddenly, when it comes to comparing the Abrams vs T-80BVM or uparmored Leopards, “armor actually doesn’t matter at all”?
These three tanks have virtually the same mobility and firepower. That’s a tie in those aspects of armor did not matter at all like some pretend. The tiebreaker is the armor.
Why is it that people understand that armor is important when it comes to Abrams vs Ariete
3 Likes
How many are there and what’s the difference between each Demo?
Well their was only 2 demo 1 was basic just a 2a6 with additional armour nothing that fancy demo 2 was all that and a new powerpack the Europowerpack alongside a new apu atleast thoses are the main differences oh and demo 2 was used for the leopard 2 PSO just something cool to add (: