Its a C F.3R, but we were talking about Indonesia and potential French future.
1 Like
Tbf it hasn’t stopped gaijin from adding superior versions of other nations vehicles before the host nation got it, why start now?
It very much has, for example the Su-30MKM was deliberately only added alongside the superior Su-30SM2 according to statements made around the time, and it sounded like they try to follow this logic when it comes to top tier specifically, at least from that point forward.
oh right mb, all i want when it comes to rafales is an indian one so britain has all 3 eurocanards
So i wanted to touch topic of alliances in WT, is it possible for gajing to make actual USSR TT or we will stay with just Russian TT, i was thinking it is possible to make tech tree made of all former Soviet republics, all of them would have full tech trees and at each rank players would need to grind at least 10 vehicles to unlock next era, i mean BR range/tier. So if someone wanted to grind Ukraine didn’t needed to grind Russian vehicles at all, i would say it would be good way to reduce copy paste, as copy paste vehicles in such alliance, not main TT and subtt, but actual alliance with all TT being equal, i understand that some nations may lack own designs but instead of making a lot copy paste there would be just original vehicles with camouflages from multiple nations, obviously modified vehicles would be separate.
I wanted also mention problem with Israeli TT, i wanted turkey in alliance because turkey uses American wepons, modified vehicles, additional M113 and M60 variants which i love, both Israel and turkey are middle eastern. Other option was India, it is commonly known fact Israel is great ally of India. Another option was chile, which uses a lot of israeli technology. Have also similar vibe i think, people literally wanted it, probably also voted for it. Then there is Singapore, community voted for it to go to israeli TT, second option was japan with slightly less votes. But weh, gajing decided to tear it apart and put pieces to different TT.
I have nothing against Greece and Cyprus being in israeli TT, but please don’t treat Greece and Cyprus as sub tech tree, treat it as full alliance with them having full tech trees. I want unique vehicles from these nations, i don’t wanna to get only copy paste with different camouflage, even i appreciate Greek orange and brown camouflages, they look great. Just please add unique vehicles, possibly all of them over time in very slow manner like you do. Israel still has huge amount of unique vehicles which still aren’t added for some reasons like some versions of TAM light tanks. Era 1-3 with unique half tracks, shermans and many more, including more modern ones. Israeli TT don’t have even some merkavas that USA has in their TT, despite not having them in reality, to be honest they should be removed, shouldn’t drop from boxes and should be removed from market, obviously owners who grinded them during their events should keep them.
Also can you tell me how and where i can post in such manner that people would vote if they want real USSR TT, also they would discuss Greece and Cyprus on the topic of copy paste fearing. I am pretty sure no one will find my post here apart from moderator.
- I want all Soviet republics to be well represented in USSR TT
- I want USSR TT to just keep being Russian TT
- I want Greece and Cyprus to be well represented as full tech trees in alliance with Israel
- I want Greece and Cyprus to be just typical sub-tech trees
0
voters
1 Like
I might have something you could be interested in
11 Likes
Well there are three problems with USSR evolving into an alliance:
- Obvious
- Apart from the obvious thing, some countries are using NATO equipment, which should not belong in the tree
- Some countries just don’t have anything meaningfully original enough to be added
5 Likes
And yet somehow I expect the brits to have the worst KD in their Rafale, unless it gets a better load out than the current Rafale then it will be the best given they need it for a marginal increase while complaining theirs is the worst.
Me too, bud.
We want armoured vehicles with an actual reverse gear. m1A1, Leopard 2, chally 2, you name it we want it.
Also who can resist getting F-16AM or Mirage 2000-5F these days? Or a frankeinstein MiG-29/Su-27/Su-24/Su-25?
Seriously though. It’s highly unlikely since USSR (or really, just Russia) has more than enough for its own tree without needing more additions from a “subtree”, kinda like the USA TT.
Reverse gear, Soviet, God give me the T-72FIN I need a 22kph reverse T-72
1 Like
saying this while britain has the highest top tier winrate and the british typhoon has the best k/d ratio out of the other 2 typhoons AND the rafale which is considered a superior jet?
and the top tier winrates
I say that’s not enough, we need the Indian Rafales too : ( lol
Lol defensive much? I’m saying that while having the best Gripen C and barely doing better than the inferior models.
Literally no one plays the SA Gripen that much when the plane they want most (Eurofighter) is right after, so of course stats are ‘average’ in comparison
For a jet that was the best Gripen when the Gripen was added and stayed the best Gripen when Fox 3 was added. The average KD is pretty sad tbh.also you say that but I have met some crazy ZA Gripen fans that only play the Gripen.
its not defensive if its just simply proving you wrong with basic statistics?
and yes the gripen c is tied 1st for K/D with the japanese gripen
having the best gripen C is a bit of push its dependant on the player the derby and the amraam are sidegrades to eachother, you want better range go for the amraam you want better close range ability go for the derby so calling it the “best” gripen c isnt factual more just an opinion and all gripen c models are sidegrades to eachother mostly
@Smin1080p_WT
Are there any plans of adding a batch of Romanian vehicles inside the TT anytime soon, that is not within the premium or event section of the game?
1 Like
note that the AESAphoon has a significantly smaller sample pool, things are very likely to be worse for it if its sample pool was the same as the raphaello’s
idk what that means but it changes nothing of what i said
less players using the Aesa Eurofighters compared to the rafale. Stats of the rafale have been nuked due to it being the only version (compared to the 3 identical aesa typhoons found, and being around for alot less time)