Plus HMD and better engines
Well they recently asked for the whole document on the AIM-120s so maybe they’ll finally do something.
https://community.gaijin.net/p/warthunder/i/FTINp3ILB1Ls?comment=ndKbZ6LLZUYmEU1FQR2uJujv
Although it is a little weird why they’d ask for the whole document rather than just implementing the report.
They tend to do that if they belive your source.
1 Like
HMD is certainly something, but slightly better engines means nearly nothing for it, the whole Jaguar airframe is rather poor
I’m still waiting for the Japanese Il-2, the Ki-51, or its improved version, the Ki-71. Is it really that difficult? You could even turn the Ki-102 Otsu into a ground attack aircraft (adding historical armament) and then add the Ki-102 Ko as an interceptor. Yes, I know the Japanese used the Ki-102 Otsu as an interceptor against B-29s, but that doesn’t mean it was designed for that purpose. Is it too much to ask for an attack aircraft for Japan with a rating lower than 7.7 that will not be a rank I aircraft?
2 Likes
Remember Alvis made some for MOWAG, specifically a 25mm and 25mm/TOW versions.
I want to see funny looking vehicle added
4 Likes
FYI your first image of a “SU-30MKK” with PL-12’s is a J-16 with PL-15’s and PL-10’s
And the last 2 images are of SU-30MK2’s only the second image has a MKK
These are MKK’s
1 Like
Much agree
Australian P-43D might be your answer (Its pending rn). These look like squished P-47 meaning cursed in their own right
Dont forget this thing
Very excited for the MV-22B suggestion being passed. (And hopefully turn up in the game at some point)
Would be very limited with it’s armament of either 2 Hydra/APKWS rocket pods or 2 AGM-176 missiles and a 7.62 GAU-17 turret along with AN/ALE-47 CM dispensers and potentially DIRCM so it won’t be completely defenceless. Would be more of a collectors addition, crap but still cool as hell to see in-game.
I just hope we actually do see it and it doesn’t end up like the ACH-47.
1 Like
They realized the only realistic naval planes are MiG-29s and are doing everything in their power to not add one
1 Like
Funnily enough, damage visuals were MUCH closer to this back in the times of Birds of Prey, Birds of Steel and Early War Thunder.
They changed it to be much less invasive at some point in the last few years for some reason.
Then there’s lso the fact that all planes die SO easily and quickly upon being hit once or twice, so there isn’t much chance to see them flying damaged on the first place.
This is exactly my Conspiracy Theory…when it comes to missiles and the addition of new ones, the old ones get toned down to make the new set feel much better when added. I’ve played Thousands of games in the Flankers and have noticed the IRCCM of the 73 become a Joke when the target starts using counters multiple seconds After you fire, in shots that should have an fov that would not see the counters at all!
1 Like
I dont think so, rather it has to do with the fact that players have grown and adapted to these missiles, which btw was added 841 days ago. its not completely impossible to flare these missiles even in a close range rear aspect shot if you flare correctly
I’m off to work atm…but I will get clips later and I’m sure even you will scratch your head my Friend!
M47 (90 mm) for italy when?, we need a tank at that br.
1 Like
As I believe replied to you before in other threads the supersonic Cd0 value is the one in concern. Su30SM2 should have wayyyyy more drag as a significantly larger plane.
Also just asking how do u get this series of stats?