In GPS dennied environment there is no GPS for the target so it must use the IR/IO for terminal or MBDA is lying about it being used in GPS denied environments
Well if you think about the entire tree and not just the F-15EX itself, putting it under the strike eagle wouldn’t be that incoherent. The 3rd line can already be filled with at least 3 different raptors. The F-15EX also keeps all a2g capabilities from the F-15E, and as such would act as the highest ranked heavy attacker in the tree (not comparable with the F-35s and their pretty limited load). And finally, stealth fighters will probably not be that much of a meta and the F-15EX will probably face these, so it could be coherent to put it along stealth fighters instead of above them
uhh, we dont realy got problems as far as i am aware. @Mytho-GR1 mytho and i already did write amicably multiple times already.
sure we dont share every opinion. But i dont think we are enemies
ngl idek what the difference would be other than epaws, all the advanced eagles same essentially the same to me.
also the ex is the one the us uses, idk why they would get a foreign air craft if they can get a domestic one that they actually use
IMO its FM is simply too garbage to be put any higher than 14.0 even with aesa
And the A/C models don’t get better engines. Unless they want to add that one test bed f-15b, that aint happening